Suppr超能文献

多发性睡眠潜伏期试验在非猝倒性发作性睡病和特发性嗜睡症中的重测信度。

Test-retest reliability of the multiple sleep latency test in narcolepsy without cataplexy and idiopathic hypersomnia.

机构信息

Program in Sleep, Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Sleep Med. 2013 Aug 15;9(8):789-95. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.2922.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Differentiation of narcolepsy without cataplexy from idiopathic hypersomnia relies entirely upon the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). However, the test-retest reliability for these central nervous system hypersomnias has never been determined.

METHODS

Patients with narcolepsy without cataplexy, idiopathic hypersomnia, and physiologic hypersomnia who underwent two diagnostic multiple sleep latency tests were identified retrospectively. Correlations between the mean sleep latencies on the two studies were evaluated, and we probed for demographic and clinical features associated with reproducibility versus change in diagnosis.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (58% women, mean age 34 years) were included. Inter -test interval was 4.2 ± 3.8 years (range 2.5 months to 16.9 years). Mean sleep latencies on the first and second tests were 5.5 (± 3.7 SD) and 7.3 (± 3.9) minutes, respectively, with no significant correlation (r = 0.17, p = 0.31). A change in diagnosis occurred in 53% of patients, and was accounted for by a difference in the mean sleep latency (N = 15, 42%) or the number of sleep onset REM periods (N = 11, 31%). The only feature predictive of a diagnosis change was a history of hypnagogic or hypnopompic hallucinations.

CONCLUSIONS

The multiple sleep latency test demonstrates poor test-retest reliability in a clinical population of patients with central nervous system hypersomnia evaluated in a tertiary referral center. Alternative diagnostic tools are needed.

摘要

研究目的

不伴猝倒的发作性睡病与特发性嗜睡症的区分完全依赖于多次睡眠潜伏期试验(MSLT)。然而,这些中枢神经系统嗜睡症的测试-重测信度从未被确定过。

方法

回顾性地确定了接受了两次诊断性多次睡眠潜伏期测试的不伴猝倒的发作性睡病、特发性嗜睡症和生理性嗜睡症患者。评估了两次研究中的平均睡眠潜伏期之间的相关性,并探讨了与重复性或诊断变化相关的人口统计学和临床特征。

结果

36 名患者(58%为女性,平均年龄 34 岁)被纳入研究。两次测试之间的间隔为 4.2±3.8 年(范围 2.5 个月至 16.9 年)。第一次和第二次测试的平均睡眠潜伏期分别为 5.5(±3.7 个标准差)和 7.3(±3.9)分钟,无显著相关性(r=0.17,p=0.31)。53%的患者的诊断发生了变化,这是由于平均睡眠潜伏期(N=15,42%)或睡眠起始 REM 期的数量(N=11,31%)的差异造成的。唯一能预测诊断变化的特征是催眠或催眠幻觉的病史。

结论

在三级转诊中心评估的中枢神经系统嗜睡症的临床患者群体中,多次睡眠潜伏期试验的测试-重测信度较差。需要替代的诊断工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Present and Future of Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence.发作性睡病中枢性障碍的现状与未来。
J Sleep Res. 2025 Oct;34(5):e70118. doi: 10.1111/jsr.70118. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
10
Narcolepsy and rapid eye movement sleep.发作性睡病与快速眼动睡眠
J Sleep Res. 2025 Apr;34(2):e14277. doi: 10.1111/jsr.14277. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

5
Familial aggregation of narcolepsy.家族性发作性睡病聚集现象。
Sleep Med. 2011 Dec;12(10):947-51. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Oct 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验