Giorgio Floriana, Principi Mariabeatrice, De Francesco Vincenzo, Zullo Angelo, Losurdo Giuseppe, Di Leo Alfredo, Ierardi Enzo
Floriana Giorgio, Vincenzo De Francesco, Enzo Ierardi, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71100 Foggia, Italy.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2013 Aug 15;4(3):43-6. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v4.i3.43.
Conventional triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication have recently shown a disappointing reduction in effectiveness in many countries. The main reason for failure was found to be bacterial resistance to one of the most commonly used antibiotics, clarithromycin. An additional problem for conventional triple therapy is the high rate of resistance to metronidazole found in Europe, America and Asia. In Italy, in the last 15 years a 2-fold increase in resistance has occurred. A recent study of the whole of Italy included about 20 patients from each region at the first endoscopic diagnosis of H. pylori infection. The most surprising result was the patchy distribution of resistance, which was almost absent in two regions (one northern and one southern), although the highest prevalence was found in some regions of the South. In the paediatric population we found a 25% prevalence of resistance in a sample of H. pylori positive children observed between 2002 and 2007, mirroring data obtained in southern European countries. Clarithromycin resistance assessment is currently based on phenotypic detection performed after culture the agar dilution method or E-test, and genotypic methods based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In a recent comparative study we found a 71.2% agreement between the two methods. Culture-free techniques are highly accurate in finding even minimal traces of genotypically resistant strains. Moreover, PCR-based tools are accurate in detecting a heteroresistant status, defined as the co-existence of some strains that are susceptible and some resistant to the same antibiotic in an individual patient. Three point mutations, namely A2143G, A2142G and A2142C, are responsible for 90% of cases of primary clarithromycin resistance in H. pylori strains isolated in Western countries, although we previously demonstrated that the presence of the A2143G mutation, but not A2142G or A2142C, significantly lowered the H. pylori eradication rate. Treatment failure has considerable cost/benefit implications because of "waste" of National Health System and patient resources, in terms of drugs, further diagnostic tests and medical examination expenses. Therefore, in future it would be very useful to be able to test for clarithromycin resistance before starting conventional triple therapy. Hopefully, fast, effective non-invasive tests may soon be devised to determine this condition.
用于根除幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)的传统三联疗法近来在许多国家的有效性下降,令人失望。治疗失败的主要原因是细菌对最常用的抗生素之一克拉霉素产生了耐药性。传统三联疗法的另一个问题是在欧洲、美洲和亚洲发现甲硝唑耐药率很高。在意大利,过去15年耐药性增加了两倍。最近一项针对意大利全国的研究在首次内镜诊断幽门螺杆菌感染时,每个地区纳入了约20名患者。最令人惊讶的结果是耐药性的分布不均,在两个地区(一个北部地区和一个南部地区)几乎不存在耐药性,尽管在南部的一些地区耐药性患病率最高。在儿科人群中,我们在2002年至2007年观察的幽门螺杆菌阳性儿童样本中发现耐药率为25%,这与在南欧国家获得的数据一致。目前克拉霉素耐药性评估基于培养后通过琼脂稀释法或E-test进行的表型检测,以及基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的基因分型方法。在最近的一项比较研究中,我们发现这两种方法的一致性为71.2%。无需培养的技术在检测即使是极微量的基因耐药菌株方面也非常准确。此外,基于PCR的工具在检测异质性耐药状态方面很准确,异质性耐药状态定义为在个体患者中同时存在一些对同一种抗生素敏感和一些耐药的菌株。三个点突变,即A2143G、A2142G和A2142C,导致了西方国家分离出的幽门螺杆菌菌株中90%的原发性克拉霉素耐药病例,尽管我们之前证明A2143G突变的存在会显著降低幽门螺杆菌根除率,而A2142G或A2142C则不会。治疗失败对成本/效益有相当大的影响,因为就药物、进一步的诊断测试和医疗检查费用而言会造成国家卫生系统和患者资源的“浪费”。因此,未来在开始传统三联疗法之前能够检测克拉霉素耐药性将非常有用。希望很快能设计出快速、有效的非侵入性检测方法来确定这种情况。