• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经动脉化疗栓塞治疗:多次治疗、累计支出与生存的关系。

Transarterial chemoembolization treatment: association between multiple treatments, cumulative expenditures, and survival.

机构信息

Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

Value Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(5):760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.1630. Epub 2013 May 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.1630
PMID:23947969
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine cumulative survival and Medicaid-paid expenses associated with multiple courses of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as primary treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Medicare enrollees diagnosed with primary HCC from 2000 to 2007, ever treated with TACE, but not transplant/resection, followed through 2009 by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results Program and linked Medicare databases. Cumulative all-cause/HCC-related survival was estimated by using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models stratified by the total number of TACE treatments. Multivariate weighted Cox regressions estimated the average risk of mortality faced with nonproportional hazards. Lin's inverse probability-weighted least squares regression method estimated cumulative Medicare expenditures adjusted for censoring and covariates.

RESULTS

Of 1228 patients, 34% were stage 1, 16% stage 2, 19% stage 3, 6% stage 4, and 26% unstaged. About 44% were aged 65 to 75 years, 69% were men, and 72% were Caucasian. Over half (57%) of the patients received one course, 24% two, 11% three, and 8% four courses of TACE. One-course patients incurred an average $74,788 (95% confidence interval [CI] $71,890-$77,686), two-course patients $101,126 (95% CI $94,395-$107,856), three-course patients $111,776 (95% CI $101,931-$121,621), and four-plus-course patients $148,878 (95% CI $136,346-$161,409). One-course patients lived (all-cause) an average 1.86 (95% CI 1.82-1.90), two-course patients 2.09 (95% CI 2.05-2.13), three-course patients 2.81 (95% CI 2.66-2.97), and four-plus-course patients 3.06 (95% CI 2.95-3.18) years after diagnosis. Average risk of all-cause mortality was not significantly different between one/two courses or three/four-plus courses.

CONCLUSIONS

Cumulative Medicare expenditures nearly doubled from one-course to four-plus-course patients. On average, four-plus-course patients lived over one more year than did one-course patients. Physician/patient decisions should be balanced with consideration of efficient use of limited resources, but payer's intervention in physician discretion may not be important in this setting.

摘要

目的

研究多次经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)作为原发性肝细胞癌(HCC)的主要治疗方法与累积生存率和医疗补助支出的相关性。

方法

从 2000 年至 2007 年,选择接受过 TACE 治疗但未接受过移植/切除术治疗的 Medicare 参保者作为原发性 HCC 患者,通过监测、流行病学和最终结果计划以及相关的 Medicare 数据库进行随访,直至 2009 年。采用多变量 Cox 比例风险模型对 TACE 治疗总数分层,估计全因/HCC 相关生存率。采用多变量加权 Cox 回归估计非比例风险下的平均死亡风险。采用 Lin 逆概率加权最小二乘法回归方法估计调整了截尾和协变量的累积医疗保险支出。

结果

在 1228 例患者中,34%为Ⅰ期,16%为Ⅱ期,19%为Ⅲ期,6%为Ⅳ期,26%为未分期。约 44%的患者年龄在 65 至 75 岁之间,69%为男性,72%为白种人。超过一半(57%)的患者接受了一次 TACE 治疗,24%接受了两次,11%接受了三次,8%接受了四次。一次 TACE 治疗的患者平均支出为 74788 美元(95%置信区间[CI]:71890 美元至 77686 美元),两次 TACE 治疗的患者平均支出为 101126 美元(95%CI:94395 美元至 107856 美元),三次 TACE 治疗的患者平均支出为 111776 美元(95%CI:101931 美元至 121621 美元),四次及以上 TACE 治疗的患者平均支出为 148878 美元(95%CI:136346 美元至 161409 美元)。一次 TACE 治疗的患者(全因)平均存活 1.86 年(95%CI:1.82 年至 1.90 年),两次 TACE 治疗的患者存活 2.09 年(95%CI:2.05 年至 2.13 年),三次 TACE 治疗的患者存活 2.81 年(95%CI:2.66 年至 2.97 年),四次及以上 TACE 治疗的患者存活 3.06 年(95%CI:2.95 年至 3.18 年)。一次/TACE 治疗和三次/四次及以上 TACE 治疗之间的全因死亡率平均风险没有显著差异。

结论

从一次 TACE 治疗到四次及以上 TACE 治疗,医疗保险支出几乎翻了一番。平均而言,四次及以上 TACE 治疗的患者比一次 TACE 治疗的患者多活一年以上。在这种情况下,医生/患者的决策应该在考虑有效利用有限资源的基础上进行平衡,但支付方对医生自主权的干预可能并不重要。

相似文献

1
Transarterial chemoembolization treatment: association between multiple treatments, cumulative expenditures, and survival.经动脉化疗栓塞治疗:多次治疗、累计支出与生存的关系。
Value Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(5):760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.1630. Epub 2013 May 28.
2
Rationality and effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization as an initial treatment for BCLC B stage HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma.经动脉化疗栓塞作为初始治疗方案用于 BCLC B 期 HBV 相关肝细胞癌的合理性和有效性。
Liver Int. 2014 Apr;34(4):612-20. doi: 10.1111/liv.12307. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
3
The effect of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma on clinical and economic outcomes.可切除肝细胞癌术前经动脉化疗栓塞对临床及经济结局的影响。
J Surg Oncol. 2009 May 1;99(6):343-50. doi: 10.1002/jso.21248.
4
Superselective transarterial chemoembolization vs hepatic resection for resectable early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Child-Pugh class a liver function.超选择性经动脉化疗栓塞与肝切除术治疗肝功能 Child-Pugh 分级为 A 的可切除早期肝细胞癌。
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Mar;81(3):466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.058. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
5
Advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: transarterial chemoembolization versus sorafenib.晚期肝细胞癌:经动脉化疗栓塞术与索拉非尼的比较。
Radiology. 2012 May;263(2):590-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111550. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
6
Effectiveness of Initial Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Among Medicare Beneficiaries.经动脉化疗栓塞术对医疗保险受益人群中肝细胞癌的初始治疗效果
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Sep;13(9):1102-10. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0135.
7
Cost effectiveness of radioembolization compared with conventional transarterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.与传统经动脉化疗栓塞术相比,放射性栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌的成本效益。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Jul;25(7):1075-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 May 24.
8
Combination therapy with transarterial chemoembolization and interferon-alpha compared with transarterial chemoembolization alone for hepatitis B virus related unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.经动脉化疗栓塞术联合α干扰素与单纯经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗乙型肝炎病毒相关不可切除肝细胞癌的比较
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Aug;24(8):1437-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05863.x. Epub 2009 May 28.
9
Hepatocellular carcinoma: high hepatitis B viral load and mortality in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization.肝细胞癌:接受经动脉化疗栓塞治疗的患者中,高乙型肝炎病毒载量与死亡率相关。
Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):638-47. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121498. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
10
Prospective cohort study of transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in 8510 patients.对8510例无法切除的肝细胞癌患者进行经动脉化疗栓塞术的前瞻性队列研究。
Gastroenterology. 2006 Aug;131(2):461-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.05.021.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion in the Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Transarterial Chemoembolization.血管内不相干运动在经动脉化疗栓塞后肝细胞癌评估中的应用。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Dec 14;29(12):9855-9866. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29120774.
2
Locoregional therapy patterns and healthcare economic burden of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the USA.美国肝细胞癌患者的局部区域治疗模式及医疗经济负担
Hepat Oncol. 2021 Apr 21;8(3):HEP37. doi: 10.2217/hep-2021-0001. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Epidemiologic, humanistic and economic burden of hepatocellular carcinoma in the USA: a systematic literature review.
美国肝细胞癌的流行病学、人文和经济负担:一项系统文献综述
Hepat Oncol. 2020 Jul 21;7(3):HEP27. doi: 10.2217/hep-2020-0024.
4
Economic Implications of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance and Treatment: A Guide for Clinicians.肝细胞癌监测与治疗的经济学意义:临床医生指南。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Jan;38(1):5-24. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00839-9.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment with non-curative or palliative intent for hepatocellular carcinoma in the real-world setting.现实环境中肝细胞癌非根治性或姑息性治疗的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 10;12(10):e0185198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185198. eCollection 2017.
6
Role of antiviral therapy in reducing recurrence and improving survival in hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma following curative resection (Review).抗病毒治疗在根治性切除术后乙肝病毒相关性肝细胞癌降低复发率及提高生存率中的作用(综述)
Oncol Lett. 2015 Feb;9(2):527-534. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2727. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
7
Conventional transarterial chemoembolization vs microsphere embolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.肝细胞癌中传统经动脉化疗栓塞术与微球栓塞术的比较:一项荟萃分析
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 7;20(45):17206-17. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17206.