Suppr超能文献

传入控制行走:不同直径纤维丧失是否存在不同的缺陷?

Afferent control of walking: are there distinct deficits associated to loss of fibres of different diameter?

机构信息

Posture and Movement Laboratory, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Scientific Institute of Veruno (NO), Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri (IRCCS), Veruno (NO), Italy; Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.

Posture and Movement Laboratory, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Scientific Institute of Veruno (NO), Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri (IRCCS), Veruno (NO), Italy.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Feb;125(2):327-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the gait pattern in patients affected by different types of neuropathy.

METHODS

We recruited healthy subjects (HS, n=38), patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A) (n=10) and patients with diabetic neuropathy (DNP) (n=12). Neuropathy impairment score and neuropathy score were assessed. Body sway during quiet stance, and spatio-temporal gait parameters were recorded.

RESULTS

Most patients had reduced or absent tendon-tap reflexes. Strength of foot dorsiflexor muscles (p<0.05) and conduction velocity (CV) of leg nerves (p<0.0001) were more impaired in CMT1A than DNP, whereas joint-position sense was more affected (p<0.05) in DNP. Body sway while standing was larger in DNP compared to CMT1A and HS (p<0.01 and p<0.0001 respectively). During gait, the distribution of foot sole contact pressure was abnormal in CMT1A (p<0.05) but not in DNP. Velocity and step length were decreased, and foot yaw angle at foot flat increased, in DNP with respect to CMT1A and HS (both variables, p<0.001). Gait velocity and step length were decreased (p<0.005) also in CMT1A, but to a smaller extent than in DNP, so that the difference between patient groups was significant (p<0.0005). Duration of the double support was protracted in DNP compared to CMT1A and HS (p<0.0005). For DNP only, velocity of gait and duration of single support were correlated (p<0.05) both to sway path and lower limb muscle strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in both body sway and stance phase of gait were larger in DNP than CMT1A, indicating more impaired static and dynamic control of balance when neuropathy affects the small in addition to the large afferent fibres. Diminished somatosensory input from the smaller fibres rather than muscle weakness or foot deformity plays a critical role in the modulation of the support phase of gait.

SIGNIFICANCE

The analysis of balance and gait in patients with neuropathy can offer a tool for understanding the nature and functional impact of the neuropathy and should be included in their functional evaluation.

摘要

目的

比较不同类型神经病变患者的步态模式。

方法

我们招募了健康受试者(HS,n=38)、1 型遗传性运动感觉神经病(CMT1A,n=10)和糖尿病周围神经病(DNP,n=12)患者。评估神经病变损伤评分和神经病变评分。记录安静站立时的身体摆动和时空步态参数。

结果

大多数患者的腱反射减弱或消失。与 DNP 相比,CMT1A 患者的足部背屈肌力量(p<0.05)和腿部神经的传导速度(CV)(p<0.0001)受损更严重,而关节位置感(p<0.05)在 DNP 中更受影响。与 CMT1A 和 HS 相比,DNP 患者站立时的身体摆动更大(p<0.01 和 p<0.0001)。在步态期间,CMT1A 患者的足底接触压力分布异常(p<0.05),但 DNP 患者则没有。与 CMT1A 和 HS 相比,DNP 患者的速度和步长降低,足底平坦时的足偏角增加(所有变量,p<0.001)。与 DNP 相比,CMT1A 患者的步态速度和步长也降低(p<0.005),但程度较小,因此两组患者之间存在显著差异(p<0.0005)。与 CMT1A 和 HS 相比,DNP 患者的双支撑期延长(p<0.0005)。仅对于 DNP,步态速度和单支撑期持续时间与摆动路径和下肢肌肉力量相关(p<0.05)。

结论

与 CMT1A 相比,DNP 患者的身体摆动和站立阶段的步态变化更大,这表明当神经病变除了大传入纤维外还影响小传入纤维时,平衡的静态和动态控制受损更大。较小纤维的感觉输入减少而不是肌肉无力或足部畸形在步态支撑阶段的调节中起着关键作用。

意义

对神经病变患者的平衡和步态进行分析可以提供一种了解神经病变性质和功能影响的工具,并且应该包含在他们的功能评估中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验