Authors' Affiliations: Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Lausanne; Genomic Technologies Facility (GTF), Center for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne; Vital-IT, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, and the Ludwig Center for Cancer Research of the University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Oct 15;19(20):5749-57. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0661. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
To investigate the mechanism(s) of resistance to the RAF-inhibitor vemurafenib, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the genetic alterations occurring in metastatic lesions from a patient with a BRAF(V600E)-mutant cutaneous melanoma who, after a first response, underwent subsequent rechallenge with this drug.
We obtained blood and tissue samples from a patient diagnosed with a BRAF(V600E)-mutant cutaneous melanoma that was treated with vemurafenib and achieved a near-complete response. At progression, he received additional lines of chemo/immunotherapy and was successfully rechallenged with vemurafenib. Exome and RNA sequencing were conducted on a pretreatment tumor and two subcutaneous resistant metastases, one that was present at baseline and previously responded to vemurafenib (PV1) and one that occurred de novo after reintroduction of the drug (PV2). A culture established from PV1 was also analyzed.
We identified two NRAS-activating somatic mutations, Q61R and Q61K, affecting two main subpopulations in the metastasis PV1 and a BRAF alternative splicing, involving exons 4-10, in the metastasis PV2. These alterations, known to confer resistance to RAF inhibitors, were tumor-specific, mutually exclusive, and were not detected in pretreatment tumor samples. In addition, the oncogenic PIK3CA(H1047R) mutation was detected in a subpopulation of PV1, but this mutation did not seem to play a major role in vemurafenib resistance in this metastasis.
This work describes the coexistence within the same patient of different molecular mechanisms of resistance to vemurafenib affecting different metastatic sites. These findings have direct implications for the clinical management of BRAF-mutant melanoma.
为了研究对 RAF 抑制剂 vemurafenib 产生耐药的机制,我们对一位携带 BRAF(V600E)突变的皮肤黑色素瘤患者的转移病灶中发生的遗传改变进行了全面分析。该患者在接受 vemurafenib 治疗后获得了初次缓解,随后再次使用该药进行了治疗。
我们从一位被诊断为携带 BRAF(V600E)突变的皮肤黑色素瘤患者身上获得了血液和组织样本,该患者接受了 vemurafenib 治疗并获得了近乎完全的缓解。在疾病进展时,他接受了额外的化疗/免疫治疗,并成功地再次接受了 vemurafenib 治疗。我们对预处理肿瘤和两个皮下耐药转移灶(一个是基线时存在的,之前对 vemurafenib 有反应(PV1),另一个是在重新引入该药后新出现的(PV2))进行了外显子和 RNA 测序。还对从 PV1 建立的一个培养物进行了分析。
我们发现了两个 NRAS 激活的体细胞突变,Q61R 和 Q61K,影响了转移灶 PV1 中的两个主要亚群,以及转移灶 PV2 中的 BRAF 剪接变体,涉及外显子 4-10。这些改变已知会导致对 RAF 抑制剂的耐药性,是肿瘤特异性的,相互排斥的,并且在预处理肿瘤样本中未检测到。此外,在 PV1 的一个亚群中检测到了致癌的 PIK3CA(H1047R)突变,但在这个转移灶中,这种突变似乎没有在 vemurafenib 耐药中发挥主要作用。
这项工作描述了同一患者中不同的耐药机制的共存,这些机制影响了不同的转移部位。这些发现对 BRAF 突变黑色素瘤的临床管理具有直接影响。