Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Boyd Orr Building, Level 11, Scotland G12 8QQ, UK.
Br J Cancer. 2013 Sep 3;109(5):1172-80. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.464. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
Low adherence to adjuvant tamoxifen is associated with worse health outcomes but little is known about the cost-effectiveness of high adherence.
We conducted an economic evaluation using data for all women with incident breast cancer between 1993 and 2000 who were subsequently prescribed tamoxifen in the Tayside region of Scotland. Patient-level, lifetime Markov models evaluated the impact of high vs low adherence to tamoxifen using linked prescribing, cancer registry, clinical cancer audit, hospital discharge and death records. Direct medical costs were estimated for each patient and quality-of-life weights were assigned. Recurrence information was collected by case note review and adherence calculated from prescribing records with low adherence classed below 80%.
A total of 354 (28%) patients had a recorded recurrence and 504 (39%) died. Four hundred and seventy-five (38%) patients had low adherence over the treatment period, which was associated with reduced time to recurrence of 52% (P<0.001). Time to other cause mortality was also reduced by 23% (P=0.055) but this was not statistically significant. For an average patient over her lifetime, low adherence was associated with a loss of 1.43 (95% CI: 1.15-1.71) discounted life years or 1.12 (95% CI: 0.91-1.34) discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and increased discounted medical costs of £5970 (95% CI: £4644-£7372). Assuming a willingness to pay threshold of £25,000 per QALY, the expected value of changing a patient from low to high adherence is £33,897 (95% CI: £28,322-£39,652).
Patients with low adherence have shorter time to recurrence, increased medical costs and worse quality of life. Interventions that encourage patients to continue taking their treatment on a daily basis for the recommended 5-year period may be highly cost-effective.
低依从性的辅助他莫昔芬治疗与较差的健康结果相关,但对高依从性的成本效益知之甚少。
我们使用 1993 年至 2000 年间在苏格兰泰赛德地区接受他莫昔芬治疗的所有乳腺癌患者的数据进行了经济评估。患者水平的终身马尔可夫模型使用链接的处方、癌症登记处、临床癌症审计、住院和死亡记录来评估高与低依从性对他莫昔芬的影响。为每位患者估算了直接医疗费用,并分配了质量调整生命年权重。通过病例记录审查收集复发信息,并根据药物记录计算低依从性(<80%)。
共有 354 名(28%)患者出现记录复发,504 名(39%)患者死亡。475 名(38%)患者在治疗期间依从性低,这与复发时间提前 52%(P<0.001)有关。其他原因死亡率也降低了 23%(P=0.055),但无统计学意义。对于平均患者来说,低依从性与失去 1.43 个(95%CI:1.15-1.71)折扣生命年或 1.12 个(95%CI:0.91-1.34)折扣质量调整生命年(QALY)以及增加的 5970 英镑(95%CI:4644-7372 英镑)的折扣医疗费用有关。假设每 QALY 的意愿支付阈值为 25,000 英镑,将患者从低依从性转为高依从性的预期价值为 33,897 英镑(95%CI:28,322-39,652 英镑)。
低依从性患者的复发时间更短,医疗费用更高,生活质量更差。鼓励患者坚持每天服用推荐的 5 年治疗药物的干预措施可能具有很高的成本效益。