• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性验证 Dante Pazzanese 风险评分在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中的应用。

Prospective validation of the Dante Pazzanese risk score in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Sep;101(3):197-204. doi: 10.5935/abc.20130163. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

DOI:10.5935/abc.20130163
PMID:23949327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4032298/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the likelihood of adverse events should be estimated. Guidelines recommend risk stratification models for that purpose. The Dante Pazzanese risk score (DANTE score) is a simple risk stratification model composed with the following variables: age increase (0 to 9 points); history of diabetes mellitus (2 points) or stroke (4 points); no use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (1 point); creatinine elevation (0 to 10 points); combination of troponin elevation and ST-segment depression (0 to 4 points).

OBJECTIVE

To validate the DANTE score in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS.

METHODS

Prospective, observational study including 457 patients, from September 2009 to October 2010. The patients were grouped in risk categories according to the original model score as follows: very low; low; intermediate; and high. The predictive ability of the score was assessed by using C-statistics.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 291 (63.7%) men, the mean age being 62.1 years (SD=11.04). The event death or (re)infarction in 30 days was observed in 17 patients (3.7%). Progressive increase in the proportion of events was observed as the score increased: very low risk = 0.0%; low risk = 3.9%; intermediate risk = 10.9%; high risk = 60.0%; p < 0.0001. C-statistics was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81-0.94; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

DANTE score showed an excellent capacity to predict the specific events, and can be incorporated to the prognostic assessment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS.

摘要

背景

在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)中,应估计不良事件的可能性。为此,指南推荐风险分层模型。但丁·帕萨泽风险评分(DANTE 评分)是一种简单的风险分层模型,由以下变量组成:年龄增加(0 至 9 分);糖尿病史(2 分)或中风(4 分);未使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(1 分);肌酐升高(0 至 10 分);肌钙蛋白升高和 ST 段压低的组合(0 至 4 分)。

目的

验证 DANTE 评分在非 ST 段抬高型 ACS 患者中的有效性。

方法

前瞻性、观察性研究,纳入 2009 年 9 月至 2010 年 10 月的 457 例患者。根据原始模型评分将患者分为低危、中危和高危。通过 C 统计量评估评分的预测能力。

结果

样本包括 291 名(63.7%)男性,平均年龄为 62.1 岁(标准差=11.04)。30 天内观察到 17 例死亡或(再)梗死事件(3.7%)。随着评分的增加,观察到事件的比例逐渐增加:低危=0.0%;中危=3.9%;高危=10.9%;极高危=60.0%;p<0.0001。C 统计量为 0.87(95%置信区间:0.81-0.94;p<0.0001)。

结论

DANTE 评分对特定事件的预测能力较强,可纳入非 ST 段抬高型 ACS 患者的预后评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acc2/4032298/f78f365dfa61/abc-101-03-0197-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acc2/4032298/3699c4bf728a/abc-101-03-0197-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acc2/4032298/9344460f0d55/abc-101-03-0197-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acc2/4032298/a9733b183914/abc-101-03-0197-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acc2/4032298/f78f365dfa61/abc-101-03-0197-g04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acc2/4032298/3699c4bf728a/abc-101-03-0197-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acc2/4032298/9344460f0d55/abc-101-03-0197-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acc2/4032298/a9733b183914/abc-101-03-0197-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acc2/4032298/f78f365dfa61/abc-101-03-0197-g04.jpg

相似文献

1
Prospective validation of the Dante Pazzanese risk score in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.前瞻性验证 Dante Pazzanese 风险评分在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中的应用。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Sep;101(3):197-204. doi: 10.5935/abc.20130163. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
2
Dante Pazzanese risk score for non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.但丁·帕赞泽斯风险评分用于非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009 Oct;93(4):343-51, 336-44. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2009001000006.
3
Prognostic score for acute coronary syndrome in a private terciary hospital.私营三级医院急性冠状动脉综合征的预后评分。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014 Mar;102(3):226-36. doi: 10.5935/abc.20140012. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
4
Association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and troponin in acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与肌钙蛋白之间的关联。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014 Dec;103(6):513-20. doi: 10.5935/abc.20140155. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
5
Single spot albumin to creatinine ratio: A simple marker of long-term prognosis in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.单次尿白蛋白与肌酐比值:非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征长期预后的简单标志物。
Cardiol J. 2016;23(3):236-41. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2015.0075. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
6
Expeditious exclusion of acute coronary syndrome diagnosis by combined measurements of copeptin, high-sensitivity troponin, and GRACE score.通过联合检测 copeptin、高敏肌钙蛋白和 GRACE 评分,迅速排除急性冠状动脉综合征诊断。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;32(4):293-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.11.043. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
7
Clinical correlation of multiple biomarkers for risk assessment in patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者风险评估中多种生物标志物的临床相关性
Indian Heart J. 2008 Nov-Dec;60(6):536-42.
8
Myocardial ischemia and ventricular tachycardia on continuous electrocardiographic monitoring and risk of cardiovascular outcomes after non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (from the MERLIN-TIMI 36 Trial).连续心电图监测的心肌缺血和室性心动过速与非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征(MERLIN-TIMI 36 试验)后心血管结局的风险。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 15;108(10):1373-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.058. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
9
Interleukin-6 as a predictor of cardiovascular events in troponin-negative non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients.白细胞介素-6作为肌钙蛋白阴性的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者心血管事件的预测指标
Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Mar;68(3):294-303. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12245. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
10
Value of Prehospital Troponin Assessment in Suspected Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.疑似非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的院前肌钙蛋白评估价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 15;122(10):1610-1616. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.07.037. Epub 2018 Aug 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Rationality and methods of ACCEPT registry - Brazilian registry of clinical practice in acute coronary syndromes of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology.ACCEPT 注册研究的合理性和方法——巴西心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征临床实践巴西注册研究。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011 Aug;97(2):94-9. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2011005000064. Epub 2011 May 20.
2
Dante Pazzanese risk score for non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.但丁·帕赞泽斯风险评分用于非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009 Oct;93(4):343-51, 336-44. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2009001000006.
3
ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会2007年不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(修订2002年不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理指南写作委员会)报告:与美国急诊医师学会、心血管造影和介入学会以及胸外科医师学会合作制定:得到美国心血管和肺康复协会以及学术急诊医学学会认可。
Circulation. 2007 Aug 14;116(7):e148-304. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.181940. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
4
Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models.用于评估诊断试验和预测模型的受试者工作特征分析。
Circulation. 2007 Feb 6;115(5):654-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594929.
5
A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome: estimating the risk of 6-month postdischarge death in an international registry.一种适用于所有形式急性冠状动脉综合征的经过验证的预测模型:在一项国际登记研究中评估出院后6个月死亡风险
JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2727-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2727.
6
Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events.全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究中院内死亡的预测因素。
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 27;163(19):2345-53. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.19.2345.
7
Evidence-based risk stratification to target therapies in acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征中基于证据的风险分层以指导治疗
Circulation. 2002 Sep 24;106(13):1588-91. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000030416.80014.f4.
8
Risk stratification and treatment benefits in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.
Eur Heart J. 2002 Feb;23(3):187-91. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2904.
9
[Guidelines of the Brazilian Cardiology Society on unstable angina and myocardial acute infarction without ST-segment elevation: Part II: Approaches in patients with intermediate and high risk].[巴西心脏病学会关于非 ST 段抬高型不稳定型心绞痛和急性心肌梗死的指南:第二部分:中高危患者的治疗方法]
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2001 Oct;77 Suppl 2:24-38.
10
[Guidelines of the Brazilian Cardiology Society on unstable angina and myocardial acute infarction without ST-segment elevation: Part I: Risk stratification and approaches in the first 12 hours after the patient arrives to the hospital].[巴西心脏病学会关于非 ST 段抬高型不稳定型心绞痛和急性心肌梗死的指南:第一部分:患者入院后最初 12 小时内的风险分层及处理方法]
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2001 Oct;77 Suppl 2:3-23.