Hessels Laurens K
Rathenau Instituut, PO Box 95366, 2509 CJ Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Minerva. 2013;51(3):317-339. doi: 10.1007/s11024-013-9230-1.
Many science systems are witnessing the rise of intermediary organizations with a coordinating mission, but to date a systematic understanding of their function and effects is lacking. The aim of this paper is to contribute to the understanding of the coordinating efforts of intermediary organizations. Starting from the definition of coordination as , I develop a heuristic framework that facilitates the systematic analysis of coordination in science. I illustrate and substantiate my framework with the empirical case study of a Dutch coordination task force in the area of chemical technologies. Thanks to the framework I could disentangle a number of functions that this task force fulfils concerning research programming, funding allocation and supporting interactions and collaborations. This approach enabled me to systematically analyse a very heterogeneous set of processes that each deserve to be called . The analysis yields a clear overview of eight coordination processes that are each described in terms of activities, intervention, relationships, mechanisms and performance. I conclude my paper with suggestions for further research on coordination in the science system.
许多科学体系都见证了具有协调使命的中介组织的兴起,但迄今为止,对其功能和影响仍缺乏系统的理解。本文旨在促进对中介组织协调工作的理解。从协调的定义出发,我构建了一个启发式框架,便于对科学领域的协调进行系统分析。我以荷兰化学技术领域的一个协调特别工作组的实证案例研究为例,对我的框架进行说明和论证。借助该框架,我能够梳理出该特别工作组在研究规划、资金分配以及支持互动与合作方面所履行的一些功能。这种方法使我能够系统地分析一组非常多样化的过程,每个过程都值得被称为协调。分析得出了八个协调过程的清晰概述,每个过程都从活动、干预、关系、机制和绩效等方面进行了描述。我在论文结尾对科学体系中协调的进一步研究提出了建议。