Department of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 7;8(8):e68657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068657. eCollection 2013.
Hypotheses that relate body size to energy use are of particular interest in community ecology and macroecology because of their potential to facilitate quantitative predictions about species interactions and to clarify complex ecological patterns. One prominent size-energy hypothesis, the energetic equivalence hypothesis, proposes that energy use from shared, limiting resources by populations or size classes of foragers will be independent of body size. Alternative hypotheses propose that energy use will increase with body size, decrease with body size, or peak at an intermediate body size. Despite extensive study, however, size-energy hypotheses remain controversial, due to a lack of directly-measured data on energy use, a tendency to confound distinct scaling relationships, and insufficient attention to the ecological contexts in which predicted relationships are likely to occur. Our goal, therefore, was to directly evaluate size-energy hypotheses while clarifying how results would differ with alternate methods and assumptions. We comprehensively tested size-energy hypotheses in a vertebrate frugivore guild in a tropical forest in Madagascar. Our test of size-energy hypotheses, which is the first to examine energy intake directly, was consistent with the energetic equivalence hypothesis. This finding corresponds with predictions of metabolic theory and models of energy distribution in ecological communities, which imply that body size does not confer an advantage in competition for energy among populations or size classes of foragers. This result was robust to different assumptions about energy regulation. Our results from direct energy measurement, however, contrasted with those obtained with conventional methods of indirect inference from size-density relationships, suggesting that size-density relationships do not provide an appropriate proxy for size-energy relationships as has commonly been assumed. Our research also provides insights into mechanisms underlying local size-energy relationships and has important implications for predicting species interactions and for understanding the structure and dynamics of ecological communities.
与能量使用相关的体型假设在群落生态学和宏观生态学中特别有趣,因为它们有可能促进对物种相互作用的定量预测,并阐明复杂的生态模式。一个突出的体型-能量假说,即能量等效假说,提出种群或觅食者的大小类群从共享的限制资源中使用的能量将独立于体型。替代假说则提出能量使用会随体型增加、随体型减少或在中间体型达到峰值。然而,尽管进行了广泛的研究,体型-能量假说仍然存在争议,这是由于缺乏对能量使用的直接测量数据、混淆不同的缩放关系以及对预测关系可能发生的生态背景关注不足。因此,我们的目标是在澄清替代方法和假设会如何导致结果不同的同时,直接评估体型-能量假说。我们在马达加斯加热带雨林中的一个脊椎动物食果者群体中全面测试了体型-能量假说。我们对体型-能量假说的测试,这是首次直接检验能量摄入,与能量等效假说一致。这一发现与代谢理论和生态群落中能量分布模型的预测相符,这些预测意味着体型在种群或觅食者的大小类群之间对能量的竞争中并没有优势。这一结果在对能量调节的不同假设下是稳健的。然而,我们从直接能量测量中得到的结果与从体型-密度关系的间接推断方法得到的结果形成对比,表明体型-密度关系不能像通常假设的那样作为体型-能量关系的合适替代。我们的研究还为了解体型-能量关系的潜在机制提供了线索,并对预测物种相互作用和理解生态群落的结构和动态具有重要意义。