Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
Since 2004, docetaxel has been the standard first-line systemic therapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). With abiraterone recently becoming available in the predocetaxel setting, it is warranted to identify subgroups of patients who may obtain the greatest benefit from docetaxel and particularly qualify for receiving docetaxel as first-line treatment for mCRPC.
We aimed to identify factors that could characterize subgroups of patients who obtain the greatest benefit from the use of docetaxel.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: TAX327 was multinational, randomized, phase 3 study that was conducted from 2000 to 2002 in 1006 men with mCRPC.
Patients were randomized to receive docetaxel every 3 wk (D3), weekly docetaxel (D1), or mitoxantrone every 3 wk (M3), each with prednisone.
We investigated whether patients with poorly differentiated tumors (Gleason score ≥7) at diagnosis had greater benefit from D3 compared with M3 than patients with better differentiated tumors (Gleason score ≤6). Using a Cox model, we compared overall survival (OS) between the treatment groups within each subgroup of Gleason score.
The TAX 327 data showed that the OS benefit of D3 versus M3 was greater in patients with high-grade tumors (median OS: 18.9 vs 14.5 mo; p=0.009) than in patients with low-grade tumors (median OS: 21.6 vs 20.7 mo; p=0.674). Limitations of a retrospective analysis apply.
The survival benefit obtained with docetaxel is most pronounced in patients with high-Gleason-score tumors (Gleason ≥7). In a time of shifting paradigms in mCRPC, with abiraterone becoming available prior to docetaxel chemotherapy, Gleason score may help in selecting patients who obtain the greatest benefit from docetaxel as first-line treatment for mCRPC. Prospective validation of these findings is warranted.
自 2004 年以来,多西他赛一直是转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者的标准一线全身治疗药物。随着阿比特龙在多西他赛前线治疗中的应用,有必要确定哪些亚组患者可能从多西他赛治疗中获益最大,并特别有资格接受多西他赛作为 mCRPC 的一线治疗。
我们旨在确定可用于描述从多西他赛治疗中获益最大的患者亚组的特征因素。
设计、地点和参与者:TAX327 是一项多中心、随机、III 期研究,于 2000 年至 2002 年在 1006 名 mCRPC 男性患者中进行。
患者被随机分配接受每 3 周一次的多西他赛(D3)、每周一次的多西他赛(D1)或每 3 周一次的米托蒽醌(M3)联合泼尼松治疗。
我们探讨了诊断时为低分化肿瘤(Gleason 评分≥7)的患者与高分化肿瘤(Gleason 评分≤6)患者相比,是否从 D3 治疗中获益更大。使用 Cox 模型,我们比较了每组 Gleason 评分亚组中不同治疗组之间的总生存(OS)。
TAX327 数据显示,与 M3 相比,D3 治疗的 OS 获益在高级别肿瘤患者中更大(中位 OS:18.9 与 14.5 个月;p=0.009),而在低级别肿瘤患者中获益更小(中位 OS:21.6 与 20.7 个月;p=0.674)。这是一项回顾性分析,存在一定局限性。
在接受多西他赛治疗的患者中,高 Gleason 评分(Gleason≥7)肿瘤患者的生存获益最为显著。在 mCRPC 治疗模式不断转变的时代,阿比特龙在多西他赛化疗之前已经可用,Gleason 评分可能有助于选择从多西他赛一线治疗 mCRPC 中获益最大的患者。有必要进行前瞻性验证这些发现。