Suppr超能文献

急性颈动脉破裂综合征的易患因素、处理和预后评估。

Predisposing factors, management, and prognostic evaluation of acute carotid blowout syndrome.

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2013 Nov;58(5):1226-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.04.056. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Massive hemorrhages occur in 6%-10% of patients with advanced cancer. Acute carotid blowout syndrome is the most severe massive hemorrhagic complication in head and neck cancer patients.

METHODS

This was a single institute, retrospective, case control study. A total of 45 patients were enrolled in this study. The predisposing factors, management, and prognosis of acute carotid blowout syndrome were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among the baseline characteristics, the site of the primary tumor (P = .003), origin of bleeding (P = .048), method of intervention (P = .005), and time to intervention (P = .006) were significantly different factors between survivor and nonsurvivor patients. After 24 hours of onset, a Glasgow Coma Scale score (P = .000), the use of inotropic agents (P = .007), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (P = .019) were significantly predicting factors for outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed bleeding from common carotid artery was an independent factor for long-term survival (odds ratio, 25.951; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.373-490.441; P < .030). The median overall survival of survivors and nonsurvivors were 12.1 (range, 3.7-118.7; 95% CI, 4.33-54.87) and 11.9 (range, 0.7-53.5; 95% CI, 5.78-25.69) months, respectively (P = .092).

CONCLUSIONS

Early and aggressive intervention is important for the successful management of acute carotid blowout syndrome. The Glasgow Coma Scale score, the use of inotropic agents, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio 24 hours after the onset were predictive factors for patients' outcomes. Bleeding from common carotid artery is an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. Long-term survival can be achieved after successful management.

摘要

背景

6%-10%的晚期癌症患者会发生大出血。急性颈动脉破裂综合征是头颈部癌症患者最严重的大出血并发症。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性病例对照研究。本研究共纳入 45 例患者。评估了急性颈动脉破裂综合征的诱发因素、治疗方法和预后。

结果

在基线特征中,原发肿瘤部位(P =.003)、出血来源(P =.048)、干预方法(P =.005)和干预时间(P =.006)是幸存者和非幸存者患者之间的显著差异因素。发病后 24 小时,格拉斯哥昏迷评分(P =.000)、使用正性肌力药物(P =.007)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(P =.019)是预测结局的显著因素。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,颈总动脉出血是长期生存的独立因素(比值比,25.951;95%置信区间[CI],1.373-490.441;P <.030)。幸存者和非幸存者的中位总生存期分别为 12.1 个月(范围,3.7-118.7;95%CI,4.33-54.87)和 11.9 个月(范围,0.7-53.5;95%CI,5.78-25.69)(P =.092)。

结论

早期积极干预对于成功治疗急性颈动脉破裂综合征非常重要。发病后 24 小时的格拉斯哥昏迷评分、使用正性肌力药物和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值是患者结局的预测因素。颈总动脉出血是多因素分析中的独立预后因素。成功治疗后可实现长期生存。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验