• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻咽癌患者颈内动脉远端置入保护性支架预防颈动脉破裂综合征的安全性和有效性:与血管内闭塞术的比较

Safety and efficacy of protective stent insertion to prevent carotid blowout syndrome at the distal internal carotid artery in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a comparison with endovascular occlusion.

作者信息

Tang Ru, Liu Shixian, Mao Song, Sun Xiwen, Wei Liming, Lu Haitao, Fu Jie, Zhang Weitian, Zhu Yueqi

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Department of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):1791-1802. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-604. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

DOI:10.21037/qims-23-604
PMID:38415115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10895091/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) frequently occurs at the distal internal carotid artery (distal-ICA) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and remedial treatments run a high risk for neurologic complications. A case-control study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of protective stent insertion at the distal-ICA to prevent CBS in NPC patients, with a comparison to endovascular coil occlusion.

METHODS

A total of 28 consecutive NPC patients at high risk of CBS from June 2019 to December 2021 in Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (a tertiary institution) were retrospectively included and divided into a stent protection group and occlusion group. Technique feasibility, treatment outcomes and neurological deficiency were compared between the two groups by two-sample test. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared patients' survival rates at mid-term follow-up.

RESULTS

Stent insertion was performed in 15 patients and ICA occlusion in 13 patients. The technical success rate was 100% in both groups. Procedure-related ischemic stroke was identified in 2 patients (15.4%) in the occlusion group, compared with none in the stent protection group. Bleeding was encountered in one patient in the stent protection group and one patient in the occlusion group, each. During a median follow-up of 10.5 (range, 2-31) months, 3 patients (20%) showed asymptomatic in-stent occlusion in the stent protection group. Notably, the median survival time was significantly longer in the stent protection group than in the occlusion group (23.3 15.8 months, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Protective stenting the distal-ICA was similarly effective in preventing CBS in NPC patients but was safer than endovascular occlusion of ICA.

摘要

背景

鼻咽癌(NPC)患者的颈动脉破裂综合征(CBS)常发生于颈内动脉远端(远端ICA),补救治疗存在较高的神经并发症风险。进行了一项病例对照研究,以评估在远端ICA置入保护性支架预防NPC患者发生CBS的安全性和有效性,并与血管内弹簧圈栓塞进行比较。

方法

回顾性纳入2019年6月至2021年12月在上海第六人民医院(三级医疗机构)连续收治的28例CBS高危NPC患者,分为支架保护组和栓塞组。通过双样本检验比较两组的技术可行性、治疗结果和神经功能缺损情况。采用Kaplan-Meier分析比较患者中期随访的生存率。

结果

15例患者进行了支架置入,13例患者进行了ICA栓塞。两组的技术成功率均为100%。栓塞组有2例患者(15.4%)发生了与手术相关的缺血性卒中,而支架保护组无。支架保护组和栓塞组各有1例患者出现出血。在中位随访10.5(范围2 - 31)个月期间,支架保护组有3例患者(20%)出现无症状的支架内闭塞。值得注意的是,支架保护组的中位生存时间显著长于栓塞组(23.3对15.8个月,P = 0.04)。

结论

在NPC患者中,对远端ICA进行保护性支架置入在预防CBS方面同样有效,但比ICA的血管内栓塞更安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07e6/10895091/c5deacbab30c/qims-14-02-1791-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07e6/10895091/c54c9d8d2838/qims-14-02-1791-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07e6/10895091/e3c614cd0a30/qims-14-02-1791-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07e6/10895091/68e2cbf60abb/qims-14-02-1791-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07e6/10895091/83c0d628ee9d/qims-14-02-1791-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07e6/10895091/c5deacbab30c/qims-14-02-1791-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07e6/10895091/c54c9d8d2838/qims-14-02-1791-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07e6/10895091/e3c614cd0a30/qims-14-02-1791-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07e6/10895091/68e2cbf60abb/qims-14-02-1791-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07e6/10895091/83c0d628ee9d/qims-14-02-1791-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07e6/10895091/c5deacbab30c/qims-14-02-1791-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of protective stent insertion to prevent carotid blowout syndrome at the distal internal carotid artery in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a comparison with endovascular occlusion.鼻咽癌患者颈内动脉远端置入保护性支架预防颈动脉破裂综合征的安全性和有效性:与血管内闭塞术的比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):1791-1802. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-604. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
2
Carotid blowout syndrome after nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy: successful treatment by internal carotid artery occlusion after stent implantation failure.鼻咽癌放疗后颈动脉破裂综合征:支架植入失败后通过颈内动脉闭塞成功治疗
Springerplus. 2016 Sep 13;5(1):1553. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3209-y. eCollection 2016.
3
Survival analysis of a comprehensive treatment strategy for internal carotid artery blowout syndrome by nasopharyngeal carcinoma.鼻咽癌致颈内动脉破裂综合征综合治疗策略的生存分析
Head Neck. 2023 Aug;45(8):1875-1884. doi: 10.1002/hed.27393. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
4
Extracranial/Intracranial Vascular Bypass in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer - Related Carotid Blowout Syndrome.颅外/颅内血管旁路移植术治疗头颈部癌相关颈动脉破裂综合征。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):1548-1556. doi: 10.1002/lary.29427. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
5
Endovascular treatment of carotid blowout syndrome: who and how to treat.颈动脉破裂综合征的血管内治疗:谁来治疗及如何治疗。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2010 Mar;2(1):87-93. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2009.001131. Epub 2009 Oct 6.
6
Endovascular management of internal carotid artery injuries secondary to endonasal surgery: case series and review of the literature.经鼻内镜手术后继发颈内动脉损伤的血管内治疗:病例系列和文献复习。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;125(5):1256-1276. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.JNS142483. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
7
Covered Stent Graft for Treatment of Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.覆膜支架移植物治疗头颈部癌症伴颈动脉破裂综合征患者。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Nov 1;150(11):995-1001. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.3228.
8
Emergent stent-assisted angioplasty of extracranial internal carotid artery and intracranial stent-based thrombectomy in acute tandem occlusive disease: technical considerations.紧急颅外颈内动脉支架辅助血管成形术和急性串联闭塞病变中基于支架的颅内血栓切除术:技术考虑。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Sep 1;5(5):440-6. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010340. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
9
Endovascular Treatment of Carotid Blowout Syndrome.颈动脉破裂综合征的血管内治疗
Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc. 2017 Jul-Dec;24(3-4):170.
10
Efficacy analysis of endovascular treatment for ruptured internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm hemorrhage in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy.鼻咽癌放疗后颈内动脉假性动脉瘤破裂出血的血管内治疗疗效分析
Front Surg. 2024 Aug 20;11:1451570. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1451570. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of radiotherapy in distant nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a SEER analysis.放射治疗在远处转移鼻咽癌中的作用:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 May 30;14(5):3047-3056. doi: 10.21037/tcr-2024-2332. Epub 2025 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Stent pretreatment for internal carotid artery exposed to necrotic lesions in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.鼻咽癌颈内动脉受坏死病灶累及的支架预处理
Rhinology. 2023 Jan 30. doi: 10.4193/Rhin22.451.
2
Willis Covered Stent for Treating Intracranial Pseudoaneurysms of the Internal Carotid Artery: A Multi-Institutional Study.威利斯覆膜支架治疗颈内动脉颅内假性动脉瘤:一项多机构研究
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022 Jan 29;18:125-135. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S345163. eCollection 2022.
3
Innovative application of internal carotid artery embolization in salvage endoscopic nasopharyngectomy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A case-matched comparison.
颈内动脉栓塞术在复发性鼻咽癌挽救性鼻内镜下鼻咽癌切除术中的创新应用:病例对照比较
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Jun;12(6):838-848. doi: 10.1002/alr.22927. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
4
Clinical predictors of internal carotid artery blowout in patients with radiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.放射性鼻咽癌患者颈内动脉破裂的临床预测因素。
Head Neck. 2021 Dec;43(12):3757-3763. doi: 10.1002/hed.26869. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
5
Clinical Profile and Treatment Outcomes in Patients Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Carcinoma Nasopharynx: A Retrospective Analysis.调强放射治疗(IMRT)治疗鼻咽癌患者的临床特征及治疗结果:一项回顾性分析
J Oncol. 2021 Aug 30;2021:9932749. doi: 10.1155/2021/9932749. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparing the Effectiveness of Endoscopic Surgeries With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Recurrent rT3 and rT4 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.内镜手术与调强放射治疗对复发性rT3和rT4鼻咽癌的疗效比较:一项Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Jul 26;11:703954. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.703954. eCollection 2021.
7
Treatment of Traumatic Intracranial Pseudoaneurysms: A Single-Center Experience.创伤性颅内假性动脉瘤的治疗:单中心经验
Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 25;12:690284. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.690284. eCollection 2021.
8
Comparison of Treatment Modalities in Postirradiation Carotid Blowout Syndrome: A Multicenter Retrospective Review.放射性颈动脉爆裂综合征治疗方式的比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e666-e672. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.032. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
9
Endovascular Treatment of Carotid Blowout Syndrome.颈动脉破裂综合征的血管内治疗
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Aug;30(8):105818. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105818. Epub 2021 May 25.
10
Extracranial/Intracranial Vascular Bypass in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer - Related Carotid Blowout Syndrome.颅外/颅内血管旁路移植术治疗头颈部癌相关颈动脉破裂综合征。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):1548-1556. doi: 10.1002/lary.29427. Epub 2021 Feb 11.