• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在沙特阿拉伯,利用药物经济学证据支持处方决策:方法学建议。

The use of pharmacoeconomic evidence to support formulary decision making in Saudi Arabia: Methodological recommendations.

机构信息

Pharmacoeconomics Research Unit, Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Saudi Pharm J. 2012 Jul;20(3):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsps.2011.12.006
PMID:23960792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3745172/
Abstract

In pharmacoeconomics the costs and consequences of alternative medications are compared. Many countries have begun to use pharmacoeconomic evidence to support decisions on licensing, pricing, reimbursement, or addition to the formulary. In Saudi Arabia, it is not mandatory to submit cost effectiveness evidence to support licensing or addition to the formulary decisions however, data will be considered if submitted. Previous evidence suggests that the use of pharmacoeconomic evidence by Saudi Pharmacy and Therapeutic (P&T) committee members in formulary decisions making process is limited mainly because of lack of expertise and lack of resources. This paper intended to provide Saudi P&T decision makers with a clear set of best practice methodological recommendations to help in increasing the utilisation of pharmacoeconomic evidence in the formulary decisions making process.

摘要

在药物经济学中,比较了替代药物的成本和结果。许多国家已经开始使用药物经济学证据来支持关于许可、定价、报销或纳入处方集的决策。在沙特阿拉伯,提交成本效益证据来支持许可或纳入处方集决策并非强制性的,但是如果提交,数据将被考虑。先前的证据表明,沙特药品和治疗学(P&T)委员会成员在处方集决策制定过程中使用药物经济学证据的情况有限,主要是因为缺乏专业知识和资源。本文旨在为沙特 P&T 决策者提供一套明确的最佳实践方法学建议,以帮助增加药物经济学证据在处方集决策制定过程中的使用。

相似文献

1
The use of pharmacoeconomic evidence to support formulary decision making in Saudi Arabia: Methodological recommendations.在沙特阿拉伯,利用药物经济学证据支持处方决策:方法学建议。
Saudi Pharm J. 2012 Jul;20(3):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 24.
2
The role of pharmacoeconomics in formulary decision making in different hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得不同医院药物经济学在处方决策中的作用。
Saudi Pharm J. 2011 Jan;19(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
3
Pharmacoeconomics and formulary decision making.药物经济学与处方集决策
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;9 Suppl 1:16-25. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199600091-00005.
4
Use of pharmacoeconomic data in making hospital formulary decisions.药物经济学数据在医院处方集决策中的应用。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Aug 1;59(15):1441-4. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/59.15.1441.
5
Institutional formularies: the relevance of pharmacoeconomic analysis to formulary decisions.机构处方集:药物经济学分析与处方集决策的相关性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Apr;1(4):265-81. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199201040-00004.
6
[Cost-effectiveness of new drugs impacts reimbursement decision making but room for improvement].新药的成本效益影响报销决策,但仍有改进空间。
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A958.
7
The role of pharmacoeconomics in current Indian healthcare system.药物经济学在当前印度医疗保健系统中的作用。
J Res Pharm Pract. 2013 Jan;2(1):3-9. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.114081.
8
Attitude and perception of pharmacists and healthcare professionals about the criteria used in drug formulary selection in the United Arab Emirates.阿联酋药剂师和医疗保健专业人员对药品处方集选择标准的态度和看法。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Oct 18;15(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00460-w.
9
Pharmacoeconomic analysis in formulary decisions: an international perspective.处方集决策中的药物经济学分析:国际视角
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994 Oct 15;51(20):2593-8.
10
Application of pharmacoeconomics to formulary decision making in managed care organizations.药物经济学在管理式医疗组织的处方集决策中的应用。
Am J Manag Care. 2002 Feb;8(2):161-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness and pharmacoeconomic study of using different corticosteroids in the treatment of hypersensitivity pneumonitis.不同皮质类固醇类药物治疗过敏性肺炎的效果和药物经济学研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Feb 15;24(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-02896-z.
2
Health Economic Publications From the Middle East and North Africa Region: A Scoping Review of the Volume and Methods of Research.中东和北非地区的卫生经济出版物:研究数量与方法的范围综述
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2020 Jun 8;3(2):44-54. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-4. eCollection 2020 May.
3
Attitude and perception of pharmacists and healthcare professionals about the criteria used in drug formulary selection in the United Arab Emirates.阿联酋药剂师和医疗保健专业人员对药品处方集选择标准的态度和看法。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Oct 18;15(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00460-w.
4
A retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study to critically appraise the quality of reporting of health economic evaluations conducted in the Indian setting.一项回顾性横断面描述性研究,旨在严格评估在印度背景下进行的卫生经济评估报告的质量。
Perspect Clin Res. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):25-32. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_137_19. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
5
Cost-minimization analysis of imipenem/cilastatin versus meropenem in moderate to severe infections at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia.在沙特阿拉伯的一家三级保健医院中,对亚胺培南/西司他丁与美罗培南治疗中重度感染的成本-最小化分析。
Saudi Pharm J. 2015 Nov;23(6):626-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of pharmacoeconomics in formulary decision making in different hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得不同医院药物经济学在处方决策中的作用。
Saudi Pharm J. 2011 Jan;19(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
2
Comparison of direct and indirect methods of estimating health state utilities for resource allocation: review and empirical analysis.比较用于资源配置的健康状态效用的直接和间接估计方法:综述与实证分析。
BMJ. 2009 Jul 22;339:b2688. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2688.
3
Economic evaluation of everolimus versus sorafenib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failure of first-line sunitinib.依维莫司对比索拉非尼用于舒尼替尼治疗失败后的转移性肾细胞癌的经济学评价。
Value Health. 2011 Sep-Oct;14(6):846-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
4
Surrogates under scrutiny: fallible correlations, fatal consequences.受审查的替代指标:有缺陷的相关性,致命的后果。
BMJ. 2011 Aug 15;343:d5160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5160.
5
Budget impact analysis of adjunctive therapy with lacosamide for partial-onset epileptic seizures in Belgium.在比利时,使用拉科酰胺辅助治疗部分发作性癫痫发作的预算影响分析。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(3):299-304. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.577852. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
6
Full costs of dispensing and administering fluorouracil chemotherapy for outpatients: A microcosting study.为门诊患者发放和管理氟尿嘧啶化疗的全部成本:一项微观成本研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Sep;6(3):246-56. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.07.004.
7
Transferability of economic evaluations across jurisdictions: ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report.经济评估在不同司法管辖区间的可转移性:药物经济学与结果研究国际协会良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):409-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00489.x. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
8
Cost-effectiveness of scheduled maintenance treatment with infliximab for pediatric Crohn's disease.英夫利昔单抗计划性维持治疗儿童克罗恩病的成本效果分析。
Value Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):188-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00658.x. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
9
Good research practices for measuring drug costs in cost-effectiveness analyses: an international perspective: the ISPOR Drug Cost Task Force report--Part VI.药物成本测量在成本效益分析中的良好研究实践:国际视角:ISPOR 药物成本工作组报告——第六部分。
Value Health. 2010 Jan-Feb;13(1):28-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00662.x. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
10
Utilities of the EQ-5D: transferable or not?EQ-5D 的效用:可转移性?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(9):767-79. doi: 10.2165/11314120-000000000-00000.