• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Full costs of dispensing and administering fluorouracil chemotherapy for outpatients: A microcosting study.为门诊患者发放和管理氟尿嘧啶化疗的全部成本:一项微观成本研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Sep;6(3):246-56. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.07.004.
2
Comparison of costs for infusion versus bolus chemotherapy administration: analysis of five standard chemotherapy regimens in three common tumors--Part one. Model projections for cost based on charges.输注化疗与大剂量化疗给药成本比较:三种常见肿瘤中五种标准化疗方案的分析——第一部分。基于收费的成本模型预测
Cancer. 1996 Jul 15;78(2):294-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960715)78:2<294::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-R.
3
Comparison of costs for infusion versus bolus chemotherapy administration--Part two. Use of charges versus reimbursement for cost basis.静脉输注化疗与大剂量推注化疗给药成本比较——第二部分。费用与成本报销的使用情况。
Cancer. 1996 Jul 15;78(2):300-3. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960715)78:2<300::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-#.
4
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer in Taiwan.卡培他滨与氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙作为辅助治疗台湾 III 期结肠癌的药物经济学分析。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5):647-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
5
Capecitabine versus bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin (folinic acid) as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with Dukes' C colon cancer : economic evaluation in an Italian NHS setting.卡培他滨与推注氟尿嘧啶加亚叶酸钙作为 Dukes' C 期结肠癌患者辅助化疗的比较:意大利国民健康服务体系环境下的经济学评估
Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(10):645-55. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200828100-00005.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer in Japan.在日本,卡培他滨与推注5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙用于结肠癌辅助治疗的成本效益分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(7):597-608. doi: 10.2165/11310110-000000000-00000.
7
Cost-benefit analysis of capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in the treatment of colorectal cancer in the Netherlands.荷兰卡培他滨与5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙治疗结直肠癌的成本效益分析。
Clin Ther. 2004 Apr;26(4):579-89. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90060-4.
8
Comparative and cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based regimens compared with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin alone among US elderly stage IV colon cancer patients.美国老年 IV 期结肠癌患者中奥沙利铂或伊立替康为基础的方案与 5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸单独治疗的比较和成本效益。
Cancer. 2012 Jun 15;118(12):3173-81. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26613. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
9
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of adjuvant oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-FU/LV in Dukes' C colon cancer: the X-ACT trial.卡培他滨口服辅助治疗与5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙静脉注射辅助治疗在Dukes' C期结肠癌中的药物经济学分析:X-ACT试验
Br J Cancer. 2006 Apr 24;94(8):1122-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603059.
10
Cost minimization comparison of oral UFT/leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin as adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer in Taiwan.台湾结直肠癌辅助治疗中口服 UFT/亚叶酸与 5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸的成本最小化比较。
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Jan;8(2):73-79. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0078. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Schisandrin B Suppresses Colon Cancer Growth by Inducing Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis: Molecular Mechanism and Therapeutic Potential.五味子乙素通过诱导细胞周期阻滞和凋亡抑制结肠癌生长:分子机制与治疗潜力
ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2024 Feb 22;7(3):863-877. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.4c00009. eCollection 2024 Mar 8.
2
The cost of chemotherapy administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.化疗管理的成本:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Jun;22(4):605-620. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01278-0. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
3
Sequencing Systemic Therapy Pathways for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost Effectiveness Analysis.晚期肝细胞癌系统治疗途径的排序:一项成本效益分析。
Liver Cancer. 2020 Sep;9(5):549-562. doi: 10.1159/000508485. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
4
Cancer drug development: The missing links.癌症药物研发:缺失的环节。
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2019 May;244(8):663-689. doi: 10.1177/1535370219839163. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
5
Developing a standardized healthcare cost data warehouse.开发一个标准化的医疗成本数据仓库。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 12;17(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2327-8.
6
The use of pharmacoeconomic evidence to support formulary decision making in Saudi Arabia: Methodological recommendations.在沙特阿拉伯,利用药物经济学证据支持处方决策:方法学建议。
Saudi Pharm J. 2012 Jul;20(3):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacy benefit spending on oral chemotherapy drugs.口服化疗药物的药房福利支出。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Sep;12(7):570-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.7.570.
2
Predictive factors of survival in patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell esophageal carcinoma.接受根治性放化疗的食管鳞状细胞癌患者生存的预测因素
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jul 14;12(26):4185-90. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4185.
3
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of adjuvant oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-FU/LV in Dukes' C colon cancer: the X-ACT trial.卡培他滨口服辅助治疗与5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙静脉注射辅助治疗在Dukes' C期结肠癌中的药物经济学分析:X-ACT试验
Br J Cancer. 2006 Apr 24;94(8):1122-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603059.
4
Radiation modifiers: treatment overview and future investigations.辐射修饰剂:治疗概述与未来研究
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2006 Feb;20(1):119-39. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2006.01.012.
5
Mature results from a randomized Phase II trial of cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and radiotherapy with or without tirapazamine in patients with resectable Stage IV head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.顺铂联合5-氟尿嘧啶及放疗加或不加替拉扎明用于可切除的IV期头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的随机II期试验的成熟结果。
Cancer. 2006 May 1;106(9):1940-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21785.
6
Immunomodulatory impact of interferon-alpha in combination with chemoradiation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (CapRI).α干扰素联合胰腺癌放化疗(CapRI)的免疫调节作用
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006 Nov;55(11):1396-405. doi: 10.1007/s00262-006-0140-z. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
7
A phase I/II study of nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.奈达铂与5-氟尿嘧啶同步放疗用于食管癌患者的I/II期研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006 Nov;58(5):570-6. doi: 10.1007/s00280-006-0193-x. Epub 2006 Feb 4.
8
The price tag on progress--chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.进步的代价——结直肠癌的化疗
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 22;351(4):317-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048143.
9
Cost-benefit analysis of capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in the treatment of colorectal cancer in the Netherlands.荷兰卡培他滨与5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙治疗结直肠癌的成本效益分析。
Clin Ther. 2004 Apr;26(4):579-89. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90060-4.
10
Four decades of continuing innovation with fluorouracil: current and future approaches to fluorouracil chemoradiation therapy.氟尿嘧啶四十年的持续创新:氟尿嘧啶化放疗的当前与未来方法
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 1;22(11):2214-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.009.

为门诊患者发放和管理氟尿嘧啶化疗的全部成本:一项微观成本研究。

Full costs of dispensing and administering fluorouracil chemotherapy for outpatients: A microcosting study.

机构信息

Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Sep;6(3):246-56. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.07.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.07.004
PMID:20813337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5292979/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although full costs (including direct and indirect costs) that incurred during the process of chemotherapy administration should be measured, many studies estimate only direct labor and medication costs associated with various chemotherapy delivery systems.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the total costs for dispensing and administration of fluorouracil when administered with leucovorin, by intravenous infusion or bolus, using a microcosting approach from the perspective of a provider or health system.

METHODS

A time-and-motion study was used to measure the time spent by (1) pharmacy staff in the handling, admixture, and dispensing of fluorouracil and (2) patients in the clinic. The study was performed at The Cancer Institute of New Jersey for an 8-month period. Costs of dispensing and administering fluorouracil were calculated per patient visit on the basis of resources used in the processing of fluorouracil and time spent by pharmacy staff and patient. All costs were standardized to 2005 dollars.

RESULTS

A total of 275 observations were made, and 74 (26.9%) of these were associated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Pharmacy staff spent an average of 11 minutes for bolus fluorouracil with leucovorin infusion (fluorouracil/LCV-IV) and 8 minutes for bolus fluorouracil with bolus leucovorin (fluorouracil/LCV-B). Patients who received fluorouracil/LCV-IV spent an average of 203 minutes in the clinic, whereas patients who received fluorouracil/LCV-B spent 110 minutes. The average cost of administering fluorouracil/LCV-IV was $933, which comprised drug costs ($279), dispensing costs ($189), and administration costs ($465). The average cost of fluorouracil/LCV-B was $474, which comprised drug costs ($65), dispensing costs ($141), and administration costs ($268).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to formally demonstrate the high cost of administering the injectable form of fluorouracil chemotherapy with leucovorin, despite relatively low drug acquisition cost. Therefore, reimbursement rates for fluorouracil should be calculated in such a way that covers all costs, including overhead costs for the department.

摘要

背景

虽然应测量化疗给药过程中产生的全部成本(包括直接成本和间接成本),但许多研究仅估计与各种化疗给药系统相关的直接人工和药物成本。

目的

采用微观成本法从提供者或医疗体系的角度,估计氟尿嘧啶联合亚叶酸钙通过静脉输注或推注给药时的配置和给药总成本。

方法

采用时间和动作研究来衡量(1)药剂师处理、混合和配置氟尿嘧啶的时间,以及(2)患者在诊所的时间。该研究在新泽西癌症研究所进行,为期 8 个月。根据氟尿嘧啶处理过程中使用的资源和药剂师及患者花费的时间,计算每位患者就诊时氟尿嘧啶的配置和给药成本。所有成本均按 2005 年美元标准化。

结果

共观察到 275 次,其中 74 次(26.9%)与氟尿嘧啶为基础的化疗相关。氟尿嘧啶联合亚叶酸钙推注时(氟尿嘧啶/LCV-IV),药剂师平均花费 11 分钟,氟尿嘧啶联合亚叶酸钙推注时(氟尿嘧啶/LCV-B),药剂师平均花费 8 分钟。接受氟尿嘧啶/LCV-IV 的患者在诊所平均花费 203 分钟,而接受氟尿嘧啶/LCV-B 的患者平均花费 110 分钟。氟尿嘧啶/LCV-IV 的平均给药成本为 933 美元,其中包括药物成本(279 美元)、配置成本(189 美元)和给药成本(465 美元)。氟尿嘧啶/LCV-B 的平均成本为 474 美元,其中包括药物成本(65 美元)、配置成本(141 美元)和给药成本(268 美元)。

结论

这是第一项正式证明尽管氟尿嘧啶药物购置成本相对较低,但联合亚叶酸钙给予氟尿嘧啶注射剂型的成本很高的研究。因此,氟尿嘧啶的报销费率应计算方式应涵盖所有成本,包括部门的间接成本。