• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单侧忽略脑损伤模型的终结。

The end of the line for a brain-damaged model of unilateral neglect.

机构信息

University of Colorado, Boulder.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Mar;9(2):171-90. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.171.

DOI:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.171
PMID:23962010
Abstract

For more than a century, it has been known that damage to the right hemisphere of the brain can cause patients to be unaware of the contralesional side of space. This condition, known as unilateral neglect, represents a collection of clinically related spatial disorders characterized by the failure in free vision to respond, explore, or orient to stimuli predominantly located on the side of space opposite the damaged hemisphere. Recent studies using the simple task of line bisection, a conventional diagnostic test, have proven surprisingly revealing with respect to the spatial and attentional impairments involved in neglect. In line bisection, the patient is asked to mark the midpoint of a thin horizontal lie on a sheet of paper. Neglect patients generally transect far to the right of the center. Extensive studies of line bisection have been conducted, manipulating-among other factors-line length, orientation, and position. We have simulated the pattern of results using an existing computational model of visual perception and selective attention called MORSEL (Mozer, 1991). MORSEL has already been used to model data in a related disorder, neglect dyslexia (Mozer & Behrmann, 1990). In this earlier work, MORSEL was "lesioned" in accordance with the damage we suppose to have occurred in the brains of neglect patients. The same model and lesion can simulate the detailed pattern of performance on line bisection, including the following observations: (1) no consistent across-subject bias is found in normals; (2) transection displacements are proportional to line length in neglect patients; (3) variability of displacements is proportional to line length, in both normals and patients; (4) position of the lines with respect to the body or the page on which they are drawn has little effect; and (5) for lines drawn at different orientations, displacements are proportional to the cosine of the orientation angle. MORSEL fails to account for one observation: across patients, the variability of displacements for a particular line length is roughly proportional to mean displacement. Nonetheless, the overall fit of the model is sufficiently good that we believe MORSEL can be used as a diagnostic tool to characterize the specific nature of a patient's deficit, and thereby has potential down the line in therapy.

摘要

一个多世纪以来,人们已经知道大脑右半球的损伤会导致患者对空间的对侧部分没有意识。这种情况被称为单侧忽略,代表了一系列临床相关的空间障碍,其特征是在自由视觉中对主要位于受损半球对侧空间的刺激没有反应、探索或定向。最近使用简单的线二分任务(一种常规的诊断测试)的研究令人惊讶地揭示了与忽视相关的空间和注意力损伤。在线二分任务中,要求患者在一张纸上标记一条细横线的中点。忽略患者通常会远远地偏向右侧。已经对线二分进行了广泛的研究,除其他因素外,还对线的长度、方向和位置进行了操纵。我们使用一种称为 MORSEL(Mozer,1991)的现有视觉感知和选择性注意计算模型来模拟结果模式。MORSEL 已经用于模拟与忽略性失读症相关的障碍的数据(Mozer & Behrmann,1990)。在这项早期工作中,根据我们假设在忽略患者大脑中发生的损伤,对 MORSEL 进行了“损伤”。同一模型和损伤可以模拟线二分的详细性能模式,包括以下观察结果:(1)在正常人中没有发现一致的跨主题偏差;(2)在忽略患者中,横切位移与线的长度成正比;(3)在正常人中和患者中,位移的可变性与线的长度成正比;(4)线相对于身体或绘制它们的页面的位置几乎没有影响;(5)对于以不同方向绘制的线,位移与方向角的余弦成正比。MORSEL 无法解释一个观察结果:对于特定线长度的位移,跨患者的可变性大致与平均位移成正比。尽管如此,模型的整体拟合度足够好,我们相信 MORSEL 可以用作诊断工具来描述患者缺陷的具体性质,从而在治疗方面具有潜在的应用。

相似文献

1
The end of the line for a brain-damaged model of unilateral neglect.单侧忽略脑损伤模型的终结。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Mar;9(2):171-90. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.2.171.
2
Causes of cross-over in unilateral neglect: between-group comparisons, within-patient dissociations and eye movements.单侧忽视中交叉现象的原因:组间比较、患者内分离及眼动
Brain. 2005 Jun;128(Pt 6):1386-406. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh461. Epub 2005 Mar 9.
3
Representational neglect for words as revealed by bisection tasks.词语表象忽视:来自于二分任务的证据。
J Neuropsychol. 2012 Mar;6(1):43-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-6653.2011.02003.x. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
4
Patterns of line bisection in patients suffering from unilateral spatial neglect.单侧空间忽视患者的直线二等分模式。
Acta Neurol (Napoli). 1993 Aug;15(4):241-52.
5
Line bisection error predicts the presence and severity of neglect dyslexia in paragraph reading.直线分段错误预测了段落阅读中忽视性阅读障碍的存在和严重程度。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jan;51(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.026. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
6
Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.注意力定向和量级估计中的偏差解释了交叉现象:忽视是两者的一种障碍。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Aug;17(8):1194-211. doi: 10.1162/0898929055002454.
7
Disturbed line bisection is associated with posterior brain lesions.直线二等分障碍与脑后部病变有关。
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 29;1080(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.10.071. Epub 2006 Mar 7.
8
Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.注意偏向会影响对水平线段中点的感知。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jan;49(2):238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.022. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
9
Crossover is not a consequence of neglect: a test of the orientation/estimation hypothesis.交叉并非忽视的结果:定向/估计假设的一项检验。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002 Jan;8(1):107-14.
10
The cross-over effect in unilateral neglect. Modelling detailed data in the line-bisection task.单侧忽视中的交叉效应。对线二等分任务中的详细数据进行建模。
Brain. 1998 May;121 ( Pt 5):907-21. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.5.907.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurorobotic Models of Neurological Disorders: A Mini Review.神经疾病的神经机器人模型:一篇小型综述
Front Neurorobot. 2021 Mar 19;15:634045. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.634045. eCollection 2021.
2
Lateral specialization in unilateral spatial neglect: a cognitive robotics model.单侧空间忽视中的侧向专业化:一种认知机器人模型。
Cogn Process. 2016 Aug;17(3):321-8. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0761-x. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
3
Modelling the differential effects of prisms on perception and action in neglect.模拟棱镜对忽视症中感知和行动的不同影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Mar;233(3):751-66. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4150-3. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
4
Distractor removal amplifies spatial frequency-specific crossover of the attentional bias: a psychophysical and Monte Carlo simulation study.干扰物去除增强了注意力偏差的空间频率特异性交叉:一项心理物理学和蒙特卡洛模拟研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Dec;232(12):4001-19. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4082-y. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
5
The Predictive Nature of Pseudoneglect for Visual Neglect: Evidence from Parietal Theta Burst Stimulation.假性忽视对视觉忽视的预测性质:来自顶叶θ波爆发刺激的证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 18;8(6):e65851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065851. Print 2013.
6
Effect of a visual distractor on line bisection.视觉干扰对直线二分的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jun;219(4):489-98. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3106-8. Epub 2012 May 11.
7
Modelling visual neglect: computational insights into conscious perception.视觉忽视建模:意识知觉的计算洞察。
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 15;5(6):e11128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011128.
8
Modeling orienting behavior and its disorders with "ecological" neural networks.用“生态”神经网络对定向行为及其障碍进行建模。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jun;19(6):1033-49. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.6.1033.
9
Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.注意力定向和量级估计中的偏差解释了交叉现象:忽视是两者的一种障碍。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Aug;17(8):1194-211. doi: 10.1162/0898929055002454.
10
Numbers and space: a cognitive illusion?数字与空间:一种认知错觉?
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jan;168(1-2):254-64. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0084-0. Epub 2005 Jul 26.