1Division of Nephrology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA. 2Division of Cardiac Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA. 3Division of Cardiac Surgery, Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, CA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov;14(9):e404-8. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31829f5c09.
To determine whether integrated continuous renal replacement therapy provides more accurate fluid management than IV pump free-flow ultrafiltration in pediatric patients on extracorporeal life support.
Retrospective study.
PICU and neonatal ICU in a tertiary academic center.
Infants and children less than 18 years old.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy.
Clinical data collected on patients who received free-flow or integrated renal replacement therapy while on extracorporeal life support. Normalized ultrafiltration error was calculated as: (physician specified fluid loss per 24-hr period - actual fluid loss per 24-hr period) divided by patient body weight (kg). Mixed linear regression analyses were used to model longitudinal ultrafiltration error trajectories within each mode of ultrafiltration. Based on an analysis of 458 serial ultrafiltration fluid balance measurements, integrated ultrafiltration was significantly more accurate than free-flow ultrafiltration (normalized ultrafiltration error of 1.2 vs 13.1 mL; p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient factors and time, integrated ultrafiltration was associated with a significantly lower normalized ultrafiltration error (variable estimate, -24 ± 6; p < 0.001). The use of integrated ultrafiltration was associated with shorter duration of extracorporeal life support (384 vs 583 hr, p < 0.001) and renal replacement therapy (185 vs 477 hr, p < 0.001) than free-flow patients. Overall ICU and hospital length of stay and in-hospital mortality were similar between the groups.
While free-flow ultrafiltration has the advantages of simplicity and low cost, integrated renal replacement therapy provides more accurate fluid management during extracorporeal life support. Better fluid status management with integrated renal replacement therapy may contribute to shorter duration of extracorporeal life support.
确定在体外生命支持的儿科患者中,连续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)整合超滤与 IV 泵自由流超滤相比,是否能提供更准确的液体管理。
回顾性研究。
三级学术中心的 PICU 和新生儿 ICU。
年龄小于 18 岁的婴儿和儿童。
体外膜氧合和连续肾脏替代治疗。
收集接受自由流或整合肾脏替代治疗同时接受体外生命支持的患者的临床数据。归一化超滤误差的计算方法为:(医生规定的每 24 小时期间的液体丢失量 - 每 24 小时期间的实际液体丢失量)除以患者体重(kg)。混合线性回归分析用于在每种超滤模式下对纵向超滤误差轨迹进行建模。基于对 458 项连续超滤液体平衡测量的分析,整合超滤明显比自由流超滤更准确(归一化超滤误差分别为 1.2 和 13.1mL;p<0.001)。调整患者因素和时间后,整合超滤与归一化超滤误差显著降低相关(变量估计值为-24±6;p<0.001)。与自由流患者相比,整合超滤患者的体外生命支持(384 小时与 583 小时,p<0.001)和肾脏替代治疗(185 小时与 477 小时,p<0.001)持续时间更短。两组患者的 ICU 总住院时间和住院死亡率相似。
虽然自由流超滤具有简单和低成本的优点,但连续肾脏替代治疗在体外生命支持期间能提供更准确的液体管理。整合肾脏替代治疗更好的液体状态管理可能有助于缩短体外生命支持的持续时间。