Suppr超能文献

关节镜下治疗巨大回缩性肩袖撕裂:采用前、后间隔滑动松解术进行积极松解并不能改善肩袖愈合和完整性。

Arthroscopic repair of massive contracted rotator cuff tears: aggressive release with anterior and posterior interval slides do not improve cuff healing and integrity.

机构信息

Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Shinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Aug 21;95(16):1482-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01193.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies of large-to-massive contracted rotator cuff tears have examined the arthroscopic complete repair obtained by a posterior interval slide and whether the clinical outcomes or structural integrity achieved are better than those after partial repair without the posterior interval slide.

METHOD

The study included forty-one patients with large-to-massive contracted rotator cuff tears, not amenable to complete repair with margin convergence alone. The patients underwent either arthroscopic complete repair with a posterior interval slide and side-to-side repair of the interval slide edge (twenty-two patients; Group P) or partial repair with margin convergence (nineteen patients; Group M). The patient assignment was not randomized. The Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, and range of motion were used to compare the functional outcomes. Preoperative and six-month postoperative magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) images were compared within or between groups.

RESULTS

At the two-year follow-up evaluation, the SST, ASES score, UCLA score, and range of motion had significantly improved (p < 0.001 for all) in both groups. However, no significant differences were detected between groups. Even though the difference in preoperative tear size on MRA images was not significant, follow-up MRA images identified a retear in twenty patients (91%) in Group P and a significant difference in tear size between groups (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The complete repair group with an aggressive release had no better clinical or structural outcomes compared with the partial repair group with margin convergence alone for large-to-massive contracted rotator cuff tears. In addition, the complete repair group had a 91% retear rate and a greater defect on follow-up MRA images. Even though this study had a relatively short-term follow-up, a complete repair of large-to-massive contracted rotator cuff tears, with an aggressive release such as posterior interval slide, may not have an increased benefit compared with partial repair without posterior interval slide.

摘要

背景

很少有研究对大到巨大的收缩性肩袖撕裂进行研究,这些研究检查了通过后间隔滑动获得的关节镜下完全修复,以及是否获得了更好的临床结果或结构完整性,而不是没有后间隔滑动的部分修复。

方法

该研究纳入了 41 例大到巨大的收缩性肩袖撕裂患者,这些患者仅通过边缘收敛无法进行完全修复。患者接受了后间隔滑动的关节镜下完全修复和间隔滑动边缘的侧侧修复(22 例;P 组)或边缘收敛的部分修复(19 例;M 组)。患者分配不是随机的。采用简易肩部测试(SST)、美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)评分、加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)肩部评分和活动范围来比较功能结果。在组内或组间比较术前和术后 6 个月的磁共振关节造影(MRA)图像。

结果

在两年的随访评估中,两组的 SST、ASES 评分、UCLA 评分和活动范围均有显著改善(p<0.001)。但是,两组之间没有发现显著差异。尽管术前 MRA 图像上撕裂大小的差异没有统计学意义,但随访 MRA 图像显示 P 组中有 20 例(91%)出现再撕裂,两组之间撕裂大小存在显著差异(p=0.007)。

结论

对于大到巨大的收缩性肩袖撕裂,与单独进行边缘收敛的部分修复相比,采用激进松解的完全修复组在临床和结构结果方面没有更好的结果。此外,完全修复组的再撕裂率为 91%,且在随访 MRA 图像上存在更大的缺损。尽管本研究的随访时间相对较短,但与没有后间隔滑动的部分修复相比,采用激进松解如后间隔滑动的大到巨大的收缩性肩袖撕裂的完全修复可能不会带来更大的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验