Fujimoto N
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Chiba University, Japan.
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1990 Apr;94(4):404-7.
We compared two programs with different measurement field ranges in terms of sensitivity for common coordinates using an automated perimeter Octopus. The combination of programs consisted of programs 31 and 61, 31 and PSQ, 61 and 11, 61 and PSQ. The center of program 61 was (0, 0). PSQ was made by the sargon program and a program which measured the outer 16 points of the 61. The mean sensitivity of the common coordinates in 11 was significantly better than that in 61, which was better than that in 31, and that in PSQ better than that in 31 and in 61. The sensitivity was better in programs which tested a smaller size of measurement in the central visual field.
我们使用自动视野计Octopus比较了两个具有不同测量视野范围的程序在常见坐标敏感度方面的差异。程序组合包括程序31和61、31和PSQ、61和11、61和PSQ。程序61的中心为(0, 0)。PSQ由sargon程序和一个测量61外部16个点的程序组成。11中常见坐标的平均敏感度显著优于61，61优于31，PSQ优于31和61。在测试中心视野较小测量尺寸的程序中，敏感度更高。
