Department of Crop Sciences, Division of Soil Hydrology, Georg-August University of Göttingen Göttingen, Germany.
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Aug 13;4:298. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00298. eCollection 2013.
As plant roots take up water and the soil dries, water depletion is expected to occur in the vicinity of roots, the so called rhizosphere. However, recent experiments showed that the rhizosphere of lupines was wetter than the bulk soil during the drying period. Surprisingly, the rhizosphere remained temporarily dry after irrigation. Such water dynamics in the rhizosphere can be explained by the drying/wetting dynamics of mucilage exuded by roots. The capacity of mucilage to hold large volumes of water at negative water potential may favor root water uptake. However, mucilage hydrophobicity after drying may temporarily limit the local water uptake after irrigation. The effects of such rhizosphere dynamics are not yet understood. In particular, it is not known how the rhizosphere dynamics vary along roots and as a function of soil water content. My hypothesis was that the rewetting rate of the rhizosphere is primarily function of root age. Neutron radiography was used to monitor how the rhizosphere water dynamics vary along the root systems of lupines during drying/wetting cycles of different duration. The radiographs showed a fast and almost immediate rewetting of the rhizosphere of the distal root segments, in contrast to a slow rewetting of the rhizosphere of the proximal segments. The rewetting rate of the rhizosphere was not function of the water content before irrigation, but it was function of time. It is concluded that rhizosphere hydrophobicity is not uniform along roots, but it covers only the older and proximal root segments, while the young root segments are hydraulically well-connected to the soil. I included these rhizosphere dynamics in a microscopic model of root water uptake. In the model, the relation between water content and water potential in the rhizosphere is not unique and it varies over time, and the rewetting rate of the rhizosphere decreases with time. The rhisosphere variability seems an optimal adaptation strategy to increase the water uptake of young root segments, which possibly reached new available water, and partly disconnect the old root segments from the already depleted soil.
当植物根系吸收水分,而土壤变干时,预计根系附近(即所谓的根际)会出现水分亏缺。然而,最近的实验表明,在干燥期,羽扇豆的根际比原状土壤更湿润。令人惊讶的是,灌溉后根际会暂时变干。根际中的这种水分动态可以用根系分泌的黏液的干燥/润湿动态来解释。黏液在负水势下保持大量水分的能力可能有利于根系吸水。然而,干燥后黏液的疏水性可能会在灌溉后暂时限制局部水分吸收。这种根际动态的影响尚不清楚。特别是,根际动态如何沿根系变化以及随土壤含水量变化还不清楚。我的假设是,根际的再润湿速率主要取决于根的年龄。使用中子射线照相术来监测在不同持续时间的干燥/润湿循环中,羽扇豆根系的根际水分动态如何沿根系变化。射线照片显示,与近端段的缓慢再润湿相比,远端根段的根际可以快速且几乎立即再润湿。根际的再润湿速率与灌溉前的含水量无关,而是与时间有关。结论是,根际疏水性沿根系不均匀,仅覆盖较老和近端的根段,而年轻的根段与土壤水力连通良好。我将这些根际动态纳入根系吸水的微观模型中。在该模型中,根际中的含水量与水势之间的关系不是唯一的,并且随时间变化,根际的再润湿速率随时间降低。根际的变异性似乎是一种优化的适应策略,以增加年轻根段的水分吸收,这些根段可能会吸收到新的可用水分,并使旧根段与已经耗尽的土壤部分脱钩。