Zhang Quan-Ai, Sun Xiao-Hui, Lin Jia-Ju, Li Xing-Ling
Third Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang University of TCM, Hangzhou 310053, China.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2013 Jun;33(6):481-4.
To compare the efficacy difference in the treatment of insomnia between scraping technique of stuck needle and conventional acupuncture at Anmian (Extra).
One hundred and thirty one cases were randomized into an Anmian group (68 cases) and a conventional acupuncture group (63 cases). In the Anmian group, Anmian (Extra) was selected. After arrival of qi, the stuck needling was adopted by rotating the needle gently in single direction, 2-3 rounds till the needle body was stuck tightly. Afterwards, the needle tail was touched gently with the index finger to fix the needle body and the needle handle was scraped gently with the thumbnail from bottom to up. The needle was retained for 30 min. In the conventional acupuncture group, Sanyinjiao (SP 6), Shenmen (HT 7) and Baihui (GV 20) were selected and stimulated with reducing technique by rotating the needles. The needles were retained for 30 min. The treatment was given once every day, continuously for 2 weeks in both groups. The score of each factor and the total score in Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) were assessed before and after treatment in the two groups. Additionally, the efficacies of two groups were evaluated.
For the patients in the conventional acupuncture group, the sleep quality and time of falling into spleen after treatment were improved as compared with those before treatment (all P < 0.01). The improvement of sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, hypnotic drug and daytime dysfunction, and PSQI total score did not present statistically significant difference as compared with those before treatment (all P > 0.05). After treatment, for the patients in the Anmian group, the factor score and total score in PSQI were apparently improved as compared with those before treatment (P < 0.01, P < 0.05). And the improvements of the above items were superior to the conventional acupuncture group (P < 0.01, P < 0.05). The total effective rate was 91.2% (62/68) in the Anmian group and was 74.6% (47/63) in the conventional acupuncture group. The clinical efficacy in the Anmian group was apparently superior to the conventional acupuncture group.
The scraping technique of stuck needle at Anmian (Extra) achieves the superior effect on insomnia as compared with the conventional acupuncture.
比较滞针刮针法与传统针刺安眠穴治疗失眠的疗效差异。
将131例患者随机分为安眠组(68例)和传统针刺组(63例)。安眠组选取安眠穴,得气后采用单向轻轻捻转针体的滞针手法,捻转2~3圈使针体紧紧滞住,然后用食指轻轻触碰针尾固定针体,用拇指甲自下而上轻轻刮针柄,留针30分钟。传统针刺组选取三阴交(SP 6)、神门(HT 7)和百会(GV 20),采用捻转提插泻法行针,留针30分钟。两组均每日治疗1次,连续治疗2周。分别于治疗前后评估两组患者匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)各因子及总分。同时评价两组疗效。
传统针刺组治疗后睡眠质量及入睡时间较治疗前改善(均P<0.01),睡眠时间、睡眠效率、睡眠障碍、催眠药物及日间功能障碍改善情况及PSQI总分与治疗前比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。安眠组治疗后PSQI各因子分及总分较治疗前明显改善(P<0.01,P<0.05),且上述各项改善情况均优于传统针刺组(P<0.01,P<0.05)。安眠组总有效率为91.2%(62/68),传统针刺组为74.6%(47/63)。安眠组临床疗效明显优于传统针刺组。
滞针刮针法治疗失眠的疗效优于传统针刺法。