Contandriopoulos Damien, Abelson Julia, Lamarche Paul, Bohémier Katia
University of Montréal, Montreal, QC.
Healthc Policy. 2012 Aug;8(1):67-79.
This paper analyzes the debates surrounding the privatization of health services financing in Quebec. The objective is to clarify policy-making processes with regard to this important issue and, more generally, to provide a realistic understanding of health-related policy processes in Canada. The analysis is based on a large and continuous sample of mass media and National Assembly debates on the question during the four-and-a-half years following the Chaoulli ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada. These data are used to test four hypotheses about relationships among the types of political actors involved, their policy preferences, the rhetoric they use and the anticipated policy effects they assert. The results are applied to a discussion of questions about the factors that influence the effectiveness of political communication.
本文分析了围绕魁北克省医疗服务融资私有化的争论。目的是阐明关于这一重要问题的决策过程，更广泛地说，是对加拿大与医疗相关的政策过程提供现实的理解。该分析基于在加拿大最高法院作出乔利裁决后的四年半时间里，对大众媒体和国民议会关于该问题的辩论进行的大量连续抽样。这些数据用于检验关于所涉政治行为体类型、他们的政策偏好、他们使用的言辞以及他们声称的预期政策效果之间关系的四个假设。研究结果被用于讨论影响政治沟通有效性的因素问题。
