• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2005年至2010年加拿大及对照司法管辖区行业赞助临床试验的指标调查。

Metrics survey of industry-sponsored clinical trials in Canada and comparator jurisdictions between 2005 and 2010.

作者信息

Leclerc Jean-Marie, Laberge Normand, Marion Jean

机构信息

Hôpital Ste-Justine, Montreal, QC, Former Sr. VP, Clinical and Regulatory Affairs and Chief Scientific Officer, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc., Dorval, QC.

出版信息

Healthc Policy. 2012 Nov;8(2):88-104.

PMID:23968618
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3517875/
Abstract

Industry-sponsored clinical trials play a key role in the development of therapies. This survey suggests that between 2005 and 2010, research-based pharmaceutical firms worldwide initiated fewer trials and recruited fewer subjects annually. In contrast, at the country level, the clinical trial activity of such firms increased in emerging countries and in Japan. Canada's trend in the number of new trials followed that of the global industry, but the trend in new sites and newly recruited subjects fell below the global rate. Informal comparisons point to potential issues for Canada in such areas as site capacity, cost per subject and time to first subject-in. When compared to certain Western European countries and the United States, Canada remained well positioned on a number of metrics. Nonetheless, Canada faces mounting challenges from both traditional locations and emerging countries and may require coordinated efforts to remain a place of choice to conduct trials.

摘要

行业资助的临床试验在疗法开发中发挥着关键作用。这项调查表明,2005年至2010年间,全球以研究为基础的制药公司每年启动的试验减少,招募的受试者也减少。相比之下,在国家层面,这些公司在新兴国家和日本的临床试验活动有所增加。加拿大新试验数量的趋势与全球行业一致,但新试验点和新招募受试者的趋势低于全球水平。非正式比较指出了加拿大在试验点能力、每个受试者的成本以及首个受试者入组时间等领域可能存在的问题。与某些西欧国家和美国相比,加拿大在一些指标上仍处于有利地位。尽管如此,加拿大正面临来自传统地区和新兴国家的越来越大的挑战,可能需要协同努力才能继续成为进行试验的首选之地。

相似文献

1
Metrics survey of industry-sponsored clinical trials in Canada and comparator jurisdictions between 2005 and 2010.2005年至2010年加拿大及对照司法管辖区行业赞助临床试验的指标调查。
Healthc Policy. 2012 Nov;8(2):88-104.
2
Biopharmaceutical industry-sponsored global clinical trials in emerging countries.生物制药行业赞助的新兴国家全球临床试验。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2010 Jul-Aug;56(4):428-33. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302010000400015.
3
Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: what does the literature say?医生与制药行业之间的互动:文献有何说法?
CMAJ. 1993 Nov 15;149(10):1401-7.
4
Industry Perspective of Pediatric Drug Development in the United States: Involvement of the European Union Countries.美国儿科药物研发的行业视角:欧盟国家的参与情况
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Jan;52(1):49-56. doi: 10.1177/2168479017716718. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
5
Regulatory and Clinical Experiences with Biosimilar Filgrastim in the U.S., the European Union, Japan, and Canada.在美国、欧盟、日本和加拿大的生物类似物非格司亭的监管和临床经验。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):537-548. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0341. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
6
Globetrotting firms: Canada's health biotechnology collaborations with developing countries.跨国公司:加拿大健康生物技术领域与发展中国家的合作
Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Sep;27(9):806-14. doi: 10.1038/nbt0909-806.
7
Differential Globalization of Industry- and Non-Industry-Sponsored Clinical Trials.行业资助与非行业资助的临床试验的差异化全球化。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0145122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145122. eCollection 2015.
8
Sponsorship of oncology clinical trials in the United States according to age of eligibility.根据入选年龄划分,美国肿瘤学临床试验的资助情况。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(13):4495-4500. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3083. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
9
Identification of Drug Characteristics for Implementing Multiregional Clinical Trials Including Japan.识别实施多区域临床试验(包括日本)的药物特征。
Clin Ther. 2018 Feb;40(2):284-295. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.12.010. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
10
Canada and access to medicines in developing countries: intellectual property rights first.加拿大与发展中国家的药品可及性:知识产权优先。
Global Health. 2013 Sep 3;9:42. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-42.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Canadian respiratory clinical trials from 2001 to 2011.
Can Respir J. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):181-4. doi: 10.1155/2014/491398. Epub 2013 Dec 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Boilerplate being tested for clinical trials agreements.正在为临床试验协议测试的模板。
CMAJ. 2011 Nov 8;183(16):E1179. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4016. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
2
Reflections on the Innovative Medicines Initiative.对创新药物倡议的反思。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011 May;10(5):321-2. doi: 10.1038/nrd3434.
3
The paradoxical problem with multiple-IRB review.多机构审查委员会审查中自相矛盾的问题。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1591-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1005101. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
4
Clinical trials: the balance between protecting participants and promoting drug and product development.临床试验:保护受试者与促进药物和产品研发之间的平衡。
CMAJ. 2009 Mar 17;180(6):603-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090217.
5
Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research.临床研究全球化的伦理与科学影响
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 19;360(8):816-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb0803929.
6
Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board: lessons learned from developing a multicenter regional institutional review board.安大略癌症研究伦理委员会:建立多中心区域机构审查委员会的经验教训。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 20;26(9):1479-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6441.