• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用桡动脉作为次级移植物的冠状动脉旁路移植术可改善患者生存率。

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery using the radial artery as a secondary conduit improves patient survival.

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cedars Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Aug 22;2(4):e000266. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000266.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.113.000266
PMID:23969224
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3828817/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical benefits of the left internal thoracic artery-to-left anterior descending coronary artery graft are well established in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). However, limited data are available regarding the long-term outcome of the radial artery (RA) as a secondary conduit over the established standard of the saphenous venous graft.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared the 12-year survival outcome in a set of propensity-matched CABG patients who received either the RA or the saphenous vein as a secondary conduit. A multivariable logistic regression that included 18 baseline characteristics was used to define the propensity of receiving an RA graft. The propensity model resulted in 260 matched pairs who underwent first-time isolated CABG from 1996 to 2001 with similar preoperative characteristics (C statistic=0.86). The cumulative 12-year survival estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method was higher for the RA graft patients (hazard ratio 0.76; P=0.03). This survival advantage was especially significant in diabetics (P=0.005), in women (P=0.02), and in the elderly (P=0.04.) The protective effect appeared beginning at year 5 post surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

The RA as a secondary conduit provided superior long-term survival after CABG, especially in diabetic patients, women, and the elderly. This effect was most pronounced >5 years after surgery.

摘要

背景

左内乳动脉至左前降支冠状动脉搭桥术在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中具有良好的临床获益。然而,关于桡动脉(RA)作为次级移植物的长期结果的数据有限,而 RA 是公认的隐静脉移植物的标准。

方法和结果

我们比较了一组接受 RA 或隐静脉作为次级移植物的 CABG 患者的 12 年生存结果。使用包含 18 个基线特征的多变量逻辑回归来确定接受 RA 移植物的倾向。该倾向模型得出了 260 对在 1996 年至 2001 年期间接受首次孤立 CABG 的匹配患者,其术前特征相似(C 统计量=0.86)。Kaplan-Meier 方法估计的 12 年累积生存率对 RA 移植患者更高(风险比 0.76;P=0.03)。这种生存优势在糖尿病患者中更为显著(P=0.005),在女性中(P=0.02)和在老年人中(P=0.04)。这种保护作用在术后 5 年开始显现。

结论

RA 作为次级移植物在 CABG 后提供了更好的长期生存,尤其是在糖尿病患者、女性和老年人中。这种效果在手术后 5 年以上最为明显。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c1/3828817/965ad8d7121d/jah3-2-e000266-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c1/3828817/85b0bae6ba6f/jah3-2-e000266-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c1/3828817/6626f15821ec/jah3-2-e000266-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c1/3828817/788ba94ecf96/jah3-2-e000266-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c1/3828817/965ad8d7121d/jah3-2-e000266-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c1/3828817/85b0bae6ba6f/jah3-2-e000266-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c1/3828817/6626f15821ec/jah3-2-e000266-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c1/3828817/788ba94ecf96/jah3-2-e000266-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c1/3828817/965ad8d7121d/jah3-2-e000266-g4.jpg

相似文献

1
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery using the radial artery as a secondary conduit improves patient survival.采用桡动脉作为次级移植物的冠状动脉旁路移植术可改善患者生存率。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Aug 22;2(4):e000266. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000266.
2
The second best arterial graft: a propensity analysis of the radial artery versus the free right internal thoracic artery to bypass the circumflex coronary artery.第二条最佳动脉移植物:桡动脉与游离右内乳动脉旁路回旋支冠状动脉的倾向分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
3
Age cutoff for the loss of survival benefit from use of radial artery in coronary artery bypass grafting.桡动脉在冠状动脉旁路移植术中应用丧失生存获益的年龄界限。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1078-84; discussion 1084-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
4
Radial artery grafting in women improves 15-year survival.女性桡动脉搭桥可提高 15 年生存率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;146(6):1467-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
5
Equipoise between radial artery and right internal thoracic artery as the second arterial conduit in left internal thoracic artery-based coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a multi-institutional study†.在基于左胸廓内动脉的冠状动脉搭桥手术中,桡动脉与右胸廓内动脉作为第二动脉桥的 equipoise:一项多机构研究† 。 (注:“equipoise”在医学语境中可能有特定含义,这里直接保留英文未译,需结合专业知识进一步理解其确切所指)
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jan;49(1):188-95. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv093. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
6
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Diabetic Patients: Complete Arterial versus Internal Thoracic Artery and Sequential Vein Grafts-A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis.糖尿病患者的冠状动脉旁路移植术:全动脉搭桥与胸廓内动脉序贯静脉搭桥——倾向评分匹配分析
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Sep;67(6):428-436. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1660518. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
7
Incremental Value of Increasing Number of Arterial Grafts: The Effect of Diabetes Mellitus.增加动脉移植物数量的增量价值:糖尿病的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jun;105(6):1737-1744. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
8
Late effects of radial artery vs saphenous vein grafting for multivessel coronary bypass surgery in diabetics: a propensity-matched analysis.糖尿病患者多支冠状动脉旁路移植术桡动脉与隐静脉桥的晚期效果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Oct;44(4):701-10. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt061. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
9
Ten-year real-life effectiveness of coronary artery bypass using radial artery or great saphenous vein grafts in a single centre Chinese hospital.在中国一家医院的单中心研究中,桡动脉或大隐静脉移植冠状动脉搭桥术的十年真实世界有效性。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;25(4):559-564. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx174.
10
Time-varying survival benefit of radial artery versus vein grafting: a multiinstitutional analysis.桡动脉与静脉旁路移植的时变生存获益:多机构分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;97(4):1328-34; discussion 1334. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.096. Epub 2013 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in long-term survival outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting using single vs multiple arterial grafts: a meta-analysis with reconstructed time-to-event data and subgroup analyses.单支与多支动脉旁路移植术治疗冠状动脉旁路移植术后长期生存结局的差异:一项使用重建时间事件数据和亚组分析的荟萃分析。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Feb;71(2):77-89. doi: 10.1007/s11748-022-01891-7. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
2
Radial Artery Versus Right Internal Thoracic Artery Versus Saphenous Vein as the Second Conduit for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.桡动脉与右内乳动脉和大隐静脉作为冠状动脉旁路移植术的第二条血管:临床结局的网络荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jan 22;8(2):e010839. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010839.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes.多血管血运重建策略在糖尿病患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 20;367(25):2375-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211585. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
2
Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery: clinical outcomes, patency, and need for reintervention.经桡动脉行冠状动脉旁路移植术:临床转归、通畅率和再干预需求。
Circulation. 2012 Sep 11;126(11 Suppl 1):S170-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.083048.
3
The right internal thoracic artery: is it underutilized?右内乳动脉:是否未充分利用?
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011 Nov;26(6):528-35. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32834b9f87.
4
Reappraisal of a 20-year experience with the radial artery as a conduit for coronary bypass grafting.再次评估 20 年来桡动脉作为冠状动脉旁路移植术移植物的经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.05.027.
5
Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial.桡动脉与右内乳动脉或隐静脉通畅率的 5 年以上比较:来自桡动脉通畅和临床结果试验的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jan;139(1):60-5; discussion 65-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.043.
6
Long-term (5- to 20-year) patency of the radial artery for coronary bypass grafting.桡动脉用于冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期(5 至 20 年)通畅率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):73-9, 79.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.032. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
7
Long-term patency of 1108 radial arterial-coronary angiograms over 10 years.1108例桡动脉冠状动脉造影10年的长期通畅情况。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1):23-9; discussion 29-30. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.086.
8
The impact of diabetic status on coronary artery bypass graft patency: insights from the radial artery patency study.糖尿病状态对冠状动脉旁路移植术通畅性的影响:来自桡动脉通畅性研究的见解。
Circulation. 2008 Sep 30;118(14 Suppl):S222-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.757161.
9
Does radial use as a second arterial conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting improve long-term outcomes in diabetics?将桡动脉作为冠状动脉旁路移植术的第二条动脉血管移植物使用是否能改善糖尿病患者的长期预后?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 May;33(5):914-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.062. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
10
Impact of patient and target-vessel characteristics on arterial and venous bypass graft patency: insight from a randomized trial.患者和靶血管特征对动脉和静脉旁路移植血管通畅性的影响:一项随机试验的见解
Circulation. 2007 Feb 13;115(6):684-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.567495. Epub 2007 Feb 5.