• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估住院医师书面学习目标和目标书写技能:学习目标评分量表的效度证据。

Assessing residents' written learning goals and goal writing skill: validity evidence for the learning goal scoring rubric.

机构信息

Dr. Lockspeiser is assistant professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. Ms. Schmitter is program manager for medical education, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. Dr. Lane is professor and vice chair for medical education, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. Dr. Hanson is professor and director of medical education research and development, Departments of Pediatrics and Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. Dr. Rosenberg is professor and director, Pediatric Residency Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. Dr. Park is assistant professor, Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2013 Oct;88(10):1558-63. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a352e6.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a352e6
PMID:23969364
Abstract

PURPOSE

To provide validity evidence for use of the Learning Goal Scoring Rubric to assess the quality of written learning goals and residents' goal writing skills.

METHOD

This two-part study used the rubric to assess University of Colorado third-year pediatric residents' written learning goals to obtain validity evidence. In study 1, five raters independently scored 48 goals written in 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 by 48 residents, who also responded to the Jefferson Scale of Physician Lifelong Learning (JeffSPLL). In study 2, two raters independently scored 48 goals written in 2011-2012 by 12 residents. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) assessed rater agreement to provide evidence for response process. Generalizability theory assessed internal structure. Independent-samples Mann-Whitney U tests and correlations assessed relationship to other variables. Content was matched to published literature and instructional methods.

RESULTS

The ICC was 0.71 for the overall rubric. In study 1, where the generalizability study's (G study's) object of measurement was learning goals, the phi coefficient was 0.867. In study 2, where the G study's object of measurement was the resident (goal writing skill), the phi coefficient was 0.751. The total mean score of residents with goal writing training was significantly higher than that of those without (7.54 versus 4.98, P < .001). Correlation between goal quality and JeffSPLL score was not significant. Investigators agreed that the content matched the published literature and instructional methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary validity evidence indicates that this scoring rubric can assess learning goal quality and goal writing skill.

摘要

目的

为使用学习目标评分细则评估书面学习目标的质量和住院医师目标写作技能提供有效性证据。

方法

这项两部分的研究使用评分细则评估科罗拉多大学三年级儿科住院医师在 2010-2011 年和 2011-2012 年期间撰写的 48 份学习目标,以获得有效性证据。在研究 1 中,5 名评分者独立对 48 名住院医师在 2010-2011 年和 2011-2012 年期间撰写的 48 份目标进行评分,住院医师还对杰斐逊医生终身学习量表(JeffSPLL)进行了回应。在研究 2 中,2 名评分者独立对 12 名住院医师在 2011-2012 年期间撰写的 48 份目标进行评分。组内相关系数(ICC)评估评分者的一致性,为反应过程提供证据。概化理论评估内部结构。独立样本 Mann-Whitney U 检验和相关性评估与其他变量的关系。内容与已发表的文献和教学方法相匹配。

结果

整个评分细则的 ICC 为 0.71。在研究 1 中,一般化研究(G 研究)的测量对象是学习目标,phi 系数为 0.867。在研究 2 中,G 研究的测量对象是住院医师(目标写作技能),phi 系数为 0.751。接受过目标写作培训的住院医师的总平均得分明显高于未接受培训的住院医师(7.54 分比 4.98 分,P<.001)。目标质量与 JeffSPLL 得分之间的相关性不显著。研究人员一致认为内容与已发表的文献和教学方法相匹配。

结论

初步有效性证据表明,该评分细则可评估学习目标质量和目标写作技能。

相似文献

1
Assessing residents' written learning goals and goal writing skill: validity evidence for the learning goal scoring rubric.评估住院医师书面学习目标和目标书写技能:学习目标评分量表的效度证据。
Acad Med. 2013 Oct;88(10):1558-63. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a352e6.
2
Developing a scoring rubric for resident research presentations: a pilot study.制定住院医师研究报告评分标准:一项试点研究。
J Surg Res. 2007 Oct;142(2):304-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.03.060. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
3
Is residents' progress on individualized learning plans related to the type of learning goal set?住院医师个体化学习计划进展与学习目标类型有关吗?
Acad Med. 2011 Oct;86(10):1293-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822be22b.
4
Validity evidence for a patient note scoring rubric based on the new patient note format of the United States Medical Licensing Examination.基于美国医师执照考试新的病历书写格式的病历评分细则的有效性证据。
Acad Med. 2013 Oct;88(10):1552-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a34b1e.
5
Development and initial validation of a project-based rubric to assess the systems-based practice competency of residents in the clinical chemistry rotation of a pathology residency.基于项目的评分表的制定与初步验证,用于评估病理住院医师临床化学轮转中住院医师的系统实践能力。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Jun;138(6):809-13. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0046-OA.
6
External validation of scoring instruments for evaluating pediatric resuscitation.评估小儿复苏的评分工具的外部验证
Simul Healthc. 2014 Dec;9(6):360-9. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000052.
7
Characteristics and quality of rotation-specific resident learning goals: a prospective study.旋转特定居民学习目标的特征和质量:一项前瞻性研究。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1714198. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1714198.
8
In Pursuit of Meaningful Use of Learning Goals in Residency: A Qualitative Study of Pediatric Residents.追求住院医师培训中学习目标的有意义应用:一项针对儿科住院医师的定性研究
Acad Med. 2016 Jun;91(6):839-46. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001015.
9
Validity evidence for a new checklist evaluating consultations, the 5Cs model.评估医患沟通的新检查表(5Cs 模型)的有效性证据。
Acad Med. 2012 Oct;87(10):1408-12. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182677944.
10
Developing Validity Evidence for the Written Pediatric History and Physical Exam Evaluation Rubric.为书面儿科病史与体格检查评估量规建立效度证据。
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Jan-Feb;17(1):68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the dynamics of ultrasound training in medical education: current trends, debates, and approaches to didactics and hands-on learning.探索医学教育中超声培训的动态:当前趋势、争议以及教学法和实践学习的方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):1311. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06092-9.
2
Reactivity of the triple task on writing processes and product in adults with dyslexia.三任务对阅读障碍成年人写作过程和成果的反应性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 9;14:1112274. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112274. eCollection 2023.
3
Partnering With Residents on the Redesign of the Internal Medicine Resident Self-Evaluation Form.
与住院医师合作重新设计内科住院医师自我评估表。
Cureus. 2023 Jan 3;15(1):e33304. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33304. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
Assessing for Practice-Based Learning and Improvement: Distinguishing Evidence-Based Practice From Reflective Learning.基于实践的学习与改进评估:区分循证实践与反思性学习。
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Apr;13(2 Suppl):86-90. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00847.1. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
5
Goal-Setting on a Geriatric Medicine Rotation: A Pilot Study.老年医学轮转中的目标设定:一项试点研究。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Jan 30;7:2382120519893989. doi: 10.1177/2382120519893989. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
6
Characteristics and quality of rotation-specific resident learning goals: a prospective study.旋转特定居民学习目标的特征和质量:一项前瞻性研究。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1714198. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1714198.
7
A Developmental Approach to Internal Medicine Residency Education: Lessons Learned from the Design and Implementation of a Novel Longitudinal Coaching Program.内科住院医师教育的发展方法:从设计和实施一项新颖的纵向辅导计划中吸取的经验教训。
Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1591256. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1591256.
8
A Randomized Trial of SMART Goal Enhanced Debriefing after Simulation to Promote Educational Actions.一项随机试验:通过模拟后强化 SMART 目标汇报以促进教育行动。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;19(1):112-120. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.11.36524. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
9
Lifelong learning along the education and career continuum: meta-analysis of studies in health professions.教育与职业连续体中的终身学习:卫生专业研究的荟萃分析
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017 Oct;5(4):157-163.
10
Pharmacology and Therapeutics Education in the European Union Needs Harmonization and Modernization: A Cross-sectional Survey Among 185 Medical Schools in 27 Countries.欧盟的药理学与治疗学教育需要协调与现代化:对27个国家185所医学院校的横断面调查
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Nov;102(5):815-822. doi: 10.1002/cpt.682. Epub 2017 May 30.