Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin.
Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov;24(11):2786-93. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt350. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
The proliferation marker Ki67 has been suggested as a promising cancer biomarker. As Ki67 needs an exact quantification, this marker is a prototype of a new generation of tissue-based biomarkers. In this study, we have systematically evaluated different cut points for Ki67 using three different clinical end points in a large neoadjuvant study cohort.
We have evaluated pretherapeutic Ki67 levels by immunohistochemistry in 1166 breast cancer core biopsies from the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial. We used the standardized cutoff-finder algorithm for three end points [response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (pCR), disease-free (DFS) and overall-survival (OS)]. The analyses were stratified for hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status by molecular subtype radar diagrams (MSRDs).
A wide range of Ki67 cut points between 3%-94% (for pCR), 6%-46% (for DFS) and 4%-58% (for OS) were significant. The three groups of Ki67 ≤ 15% versus 15.1%-35% versus >35% had pCR-rates of 4.2%, 12.8%, and 29.0% (P < 0.0005), this effect was also present in six of eight molecular subtypes. In MSRD, Ki67 was significantly linked to prognosis in uni- and multivariate analysis in the complete cohort and in HR-positive, but not triple-negative tumors.
Ki67 is a significant predictive and prognostic marker over a wide range of cut points suggesting that data-derived cut point optimization might not be possible. Ki67 could be used as a continuous marker; in addition, the scientific community could define standardized cut points for Ki67. Our analysis explains the variability observed for Ki67 cut points in previous studies; however, this should not be seen as weakness, but as strength of this marker. MSRDs are an easy new approach for visualization of biomarker effects on outcome across molecular subtypes in breast cancer. The experience with Ki67 could provide important information regarding the development and implementation of other quantitative biomarkers.
增殖标志物 Ki67 已被认为是一种很有前途的癌症生物标志物。由于 Ki67 需要进行精确的定量,因此该标志物是新一代基于组织的生物标志物的原型。在这项研究中,我们使用三种不同的临床终点,在一项大型新辅助研究队列中,系统地评估了 Ki67 的不同截断值。
我们使用免疫组化检测了来自新辅助 GeparTrio 试验的 1166 例乳腺癌核心活检的术前 Ki67 水平。我们使用标准化的截止值寻找算法,针对三个终点[新辅助化疗的反应(pCR)、无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)]进行了分析。通过分子亚型雷达图(MSRD)对激素受体(HR)和 HER2 状态进行了分层分析。
Ki67 截断值的范围很宽,在 3%-94%之间(用于 pCR),6%-46%之间(用于 DFS)和 4%-58%之间(用于 OS),具有统计学意义。Ki67≤15%组、15.1%-35%组和>35%组的 pCR 率分别为 4.2%、12.8%和 29.0%(P<0.0005),这一效果在 8 个分子亚型中的 6 个中也存在。在 MSRD 中,Ki67 在整个队列的单变量和多变量分析中以及 HR 阳性肿瘤中与预后显著相关,但在三阴性肿瘤中则不然。
Ki67 在很宽的截断值范围内是一个显著的预测和预后标志物,这表明数据衍生的截断值优化可能是不可能的。Ki67 可以用作连续标志物;此外,科学界可以为 Ki67 定义标准化的截断值。我们的分析解释了之前研究中观察到的 Ki67 截断值的可变性;然而,这不应被视为弱点,而应被视为该标志物的优势。MSRD 是一种用于可视化乳腺癌中不同分子亚型生物标志物对预后影响的新方法。Ki67 的经验可为其他定量生物标志物的开发和实施提供重要信息。