Naidoo S
Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Western Cape, Department of Community Dentistry, Tygerberg.
SADJ. 2013 Jun;68(5):236-7.
Patients are entitled to know about their dental and oral health, and practitioners have an ethical duty to inform them on an honest and factual basis. If this can be done without denigrating one's colleagues in any way, both patients and practitioners can benefit. As professionals, our first obligation is to place the well-being of our patients ahead of our own interests. First and foremost and for patient autonomy, we must give patients complete and truthful information regarding their current oral health status. When asked to comment on another dentist's treatment, it is not unethical or unprofessional to remember that the burden of proof regarding faulty or bad treatment s demanding and a prudent dentist must exercise great caution before making comments about other dentist's treatment. Uninformed and unjustifiable criticism is disparaging and can lead to unpleasant consequences for the unwary professional. Comprehensive and accurate records would be needed by both dentists to support their clinical judgement, if this case ever resulted in a complaint.
患者有权了解自己的牙齿和口腔健康状况,从业者有道德义务在诚实和基于事实的基础上告知他们。如果能在不以任何方式诋毁同事的情况下做到这一点,患者和从业者都能受益。作为专业人员,我们的首要义务是将患者的福祉置于我们自身利益之上。首先,为了患者的自主权,我们必须向患者提供有关其当前口腔健康状况的完整和真实信息。当被要求对另一位牙医的治疗发表评论时,记住关于有缺陷或不当治疗的举证责任重大,谨慎的牙医在对其他牙医的治疗发表评论之前必须非常谨慎,这并非不道德或不专业。不知情且不合理的批评具有诋毁性,可能会给粗心的专业人员带来不愉快的后果。如果这个案例最终引发投诉,两位牙医都需要全面而准确的记录来支持他们的临床判断。