Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06097 Halle (Saale), Germany.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Nov;66(11):1302-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
The propensity score (PS) method is increasingly used to assess treatment effects in nonrandomized trials. Although there are several methods to use the PS for analysis, matching treated and untreated patients by the PS is recommended by most researchers among other reasons because this allows assessing covariate balance before and after matching. Although the standardized difference is commonly applied to compute a measure of balance, it has two deficiencies: its distribution depends on the sample size and one cannot compare standardized differences for baseline covariates on different scales, that is, continuous, binary, ordinal, or nominal covariates.
We introduce the z-difference to measure covariate balance in matched PS analyses and illustrate it by a recent matched PS analysis from cardiac surgery.
The z-difference is simple to calculate, can be used with second moments for continuous covariates, and in most cases can also be computed from published data. Its full advantage emerges after displaying z-differences in a Q-Q plot, which allows balance comparisons with respect to (1) a randomized trial and (2) a perfectly matched PS analysis in the sense of Rubin and Thomas.
The z-difference can be used to measure covariate balance in matched PS analyses.
倾向评分(PS)方法越来越多地用于评估非随机试验中的治疗效果。尽管有几种方法可以使用 PS 进行分析,但大多数研究人员建议通过 PS 匹配治疗组和未治疗组的患者,原因之一是这允许在匹配前后评估协变量的平衡。尽管标准化差异常用于计算平衡的度量,但它有两个缺陷:其分布取决于样本量,并且无法比较不同尺度(即连续、二分类、有序或名义)的基线协变量的标准化差异。
我们引入 z-差异来衡量匹配 PS 分析中的协变量平衡,并通过心脏手术的最新匹配 PS 分析来说明。
z-差异易于计算,可以用于连续协变量的二阶矩,并且在大多数情况下,也可以从已发表的数据中计算得出。在 Q-Q 图中显示 z-差异后,其全部优势才显现出来,这允许进行以下平衡比较:(1)随机试验,以及(2)Rubin 和 Thomas 意义上的完全匹配 PS 分析。
z-差异可用于衡量匹配 PS 分析中的协变量平衡。