• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机属性分配:一种基于完整地理编码地址文件的新型地理插补程序。

Random property allocation: A novel geographic imputation procedure based on a complete geocoded address file.

作者信息

Walter Scott R, Rose Nectarios

机构信息

Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence, New South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;6:7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.sste.2013.04.005
PMID:23973177
Abstract

Allocating an incomplete address to randomly selected property coordinates within a locality, known as random property allocation, has many advantages over other geoimputation techniques. We compared the performance of random property allocation to four other methods under various conditions using a simulation approach. All methods performed well for large spatial units, but random property allocation was the least prone to bias and error under volatile scenarios with small units and low prevalence. Both its coordinate based approach as well as the random process of assignment contribute to its increased accuracy and reduced bias in many scenarios. Hence it is preferable to fixed or areal geoimputation for many epidemiological and surveillance applications.

摘要

将不完整地址分配到一个地区内随机选择的房产坐标上,即所谓的随机房产分配,与其他地理估算技术相比有许多优势。我们使用模拟方法在各种条件下将随机房产分配的性能与其他四种方法进行了比较。所有方法在大空间单元上表现良好,但在小单元和低患病率的不稳定情况下,随机房产分配最不易产生偏差和误差。其基于坐标的方法以及随机分配过程在许多情况下都有助于提高准确性和减少偏差。因此,在许多流行病学和监测应用中,它比固定或区域地理估算更可取。

相似文献

1
Random property allocation: A novel geographic imputation procedure based on a complete geocoded address file.随机属性分配:一种基于完整地理编码地址文件的新型地理插补程序。
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;6:7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 May 3.
2
Positional accuracy and geographic bias of four methods of geocoding in epidemiologic research.流行病学研究中四种地理编码方法的位置准确性和地理偏差。
Ann Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;17(6):464-70. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.10.015. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
3
Estimating the intensity of a spatial point process from locations coarsened by incomplete geocoding.从不完整地理编码粗化的位置估计空间点过程的强度。
Biometrics. 2008 Mar;64(1):262-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00870.x. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
4
Investigating impacts of positional error on potential health care accessibility.调查位置误差对潜在医疗保健可及性的影响。
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;3(1):17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
5
Evaluation of geoimputation strategies in a large case study.在一项大型案例研究中评估地理推断策略。
Int J Health Geogr. 2018 Jul 31;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12942-018-0151-y.
6
Assessing bias associated with geocoding of historical residence in epidemiology research.评估流行病学研究中历史居住地地理编码相关的偏倚。
Geospat Health. 2013 May;7(2):369-74. doi: 10.4081/gh.2013.93.
7
Error propagation models to examine the effects of geocoding quality on spatial analysis of individual-level datasets.用于检验地理编码质量对个体层面数据集空间分析影响的误差传播模型。
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;3(1):69-82. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
8
Spatial error in geocoding physician location data from the AMA Physician Masterfile: implications for spatial accessibility analysis.美国医学协会医师主文件中地理编码医师位置数据的空间误差:对空间可达性分析的影响。
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;3(1):31-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
9
[Who Hits the Mark? A Comparative Study of the Free Geocoding Services of Google and OpenStreetMap].谁命中目标?谷歌与开放街道地图免费地理编码服务的比较研究
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Sep;77(8-9):e160-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549939. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
10
Evaluating geographic imputation approaches for zip code level data: an application to a study of pediatric diabetes.评估邮政编码级数据的地理推断方法:在儿科糖尿病研究中的应用。
Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Oct 8;8:54. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-8-54.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer incidence data at the ZIP Code Tabulation Area level in the United States interpolated by Monte Carlo simulation with multiple constraints.美国邮政编码分区层面的癌症发病率数据,通过具有多重约束的蒙特卡洛模拟进行插值。
Sci Data. 2025 May 30;12(1):909. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05254-8.
2
A multi-constraint Monte Carlo Simulation approach to downscaling cancer data.一种用于降尺度癌症数据的多约束蒙特卡罗模拟方法。
Health Place. 2025 Jan;91:103411. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103411. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
3
Access to Care for Children under five in Oklahoma: a Geographic Imputation Application.
俄克拉荷马州五岁以下儿童的医疗服务可及性:一项地理插补应用研究
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2018 Oct;111(8):784-789.
4
GIScience and cancer: State of the art and trends for cancer surveillance and epidemiology.地理信息科学与癌症:癌症监测和流行病学的现状与趋势。
Cancer. 2019 Aug 1;125(15):2544-2560. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32052. Epub 2019 May 30.
5
Spatiotemporal Analysis of Oklahoma Tobacco Helpline Registrations Using Geoimputation and Joinpoint Analysis.利用空间插补和连接点分析对俄克拉荷马州烟草热线注册进行时空分析。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019 Sep/Oct;25 Suppl 5, Tribal Epidemiology Centers: Advancing Public Health in Indian Country for Over 20 Years(Suppl 5 TRIBAL EPIDEMIOLOGY CENTERS ADVANCING PUBLIC HEALTH IN INDIAN COUNTRY FOR OVER 20 YEARS):S61-S69. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000996.
6
Geographic Imputation of Missing Activity Space Data from Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) GPS Positions.基于生态瞬时评估 (EMA) GPS 位置缺失活动空间数据的地理推断。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 4;15(12):2740. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122740.
7
Evaluation of geoimputation strategies in a large case study.在一项大型案例研究中评估地理推断策略。
Int J Health Geogr. 2018 Jul 31;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12942-018-0151-y.