School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
Epilepsy Behav. 2013 Oct;29(1):178-83. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs) are poorly understood and difficult to treat. Research and theory suggest that problems with recognizing, acknowledging, and regulating emotional states (i.e., emotional dysregulation) may contribute to the development and maintenance of PNESs. However, there is a lack of well-controlled studies using dedicated measures of emotional regulation with patients with PNESs. The current study sought to address this gap.
Forty-three patients with PNESs and 24 with epilepsy completed a postal survey comprising measures of emotional dysregulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale), alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale), attachment (Relationship Scales Questionnaire), and psychopathology (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7; Patient Health Questionnaire-9; Somatoform Dissociation Questionnaire-20). Cluster analysis was used to identify possible subgroups of patients with PNESs characterized by distinct patterns of emotional dysregulation.
Two clusters of patients with PNESs were identified. The first (n=11) was characterized by higher levels of psychopathology, somatization, alexithymia, and difficulties with most aspects of emotional regulation (including identifying, accepting, and describing feelings, accessing adaptive regulatory strategies, performing goal-directed behaviors, and controlling feelings and actions) compared with the group with epilepsy. The second (n=32) was characterized by relatively high somatization and depression scores but comparatively normal levels of alexithymia and emotional regulation.
The findings suggest that patients with PNESs can be divided into at least two meaningful subgroups characterized by distinct psychological profiles, only one of which is characterized by significant problems with emotional dysregulation. Further research is needed to determine whether the relatively normal emotional dysregulation and high somatization scores of some patients with PNESs are due to emotional avoidance or more basic problems with perceptual and behavioral control.
心因性非癫痫性发作(PNES)的发病机制尚未完全阐明,且治疗效果欠佳。研究和理论表明,情绪识别、承认和调节(即情绪失调)方面的问题可能导致 PNES 的发生和持续存在。然而,目前缺乏针对 PNES 患者使用专门的情绪调节措施进行的对照研究。本研究旨在解决这一差距。
43 例 PNES 患者和 24 例癫痫患者完成了一项邮寄调查,包括情绪失调(情绪调节困难量表)、述情障碍(多伦多述情障碍量表)、依恋(关系量表问卷)和精神病理学(广泛性焦虑障碍-7 项;患者健康问卷-9 项;躯体化分离问卷-20 项)的评估。采用聚类分析确定 PNES 患者可能存在的以不同情绪失调模式为特征的亚组。
确定了两组 PNES 患者。第一组(n=11)与癫痫组相比,其精神病理学、躯体化、述情障碍以及情绪调节的大多数方面(包括识别、接受和描述感受、获取适应性调节策略、进行目标导向行为以及控制感受和行为)的水平更高。第二组(n=32)的躯体化和抑郁评分相对较高,但述情障碍和情绪调节的水平相对正常。
研究结果表明,PNES 患者可分为至少两个具有不同心理特征的有意义亚组,其中只有一个亚组存在明显的情绪失调问题。需要进一步研究确定某些 PNES 患者相对正常的情绪失调和高躯体化评分是否是由于情绪回避,还是由于更基本的感知和行为控制问题。