• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动作观察期间眼动的时间进程反映了序列学习。

The time course of eye movements during action observation reflects sequence learning.

作者信息

Press Clare M, Kilner James M

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London, UK.

出版信息

Neuroreport. 2013 Oct 2;24(14):822-6. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328364d5fd.

DOI:10.1097/WNR.0b013e328364d5fd
PMID:23974283
Abstract

When we observe object-directed actions such as grasping, we make predictive eye movements. However, eye movements are reactive when observing similar actions without objects. This reactivity may reflect a lack of attribution of intention to observed actors when they perform actions without 'goals'. Alternatively, it may simply signal that there is no cue present that has been predictive of the subsequent trajectory in the observer's experience. To test this hypothesis, the present study investigated how the time course of eye movements changes as a function of visual experience of predictable, but arbitrary, actions without objects. Participants observed a point-light display of a model performing sequential finger actions in a serial reaction time task. Eye movements became less reactive across blocks. In addition, participants who exhibited more predictive eye movements subsequently demonstrated greater learning when required either to execute, or to recognize, the sequence. No measures were influenced by whether participants had been instructed that the observed movements were human or lever generated. The present data indicate that eye movements when observing actions without objects reflect the extent to which the trajectory can be predicted through experience. The findings are discussed with reference to the implications for the mechanisms supporting perception of actions both with and without objects as well as those mediating inanimate object processing.

摘要

当我们观察诸如抓握等指向物体的动作时,我们会做出预测性眼动。然而,在观察没有物体的类似动作时,眼动是反应性的。这种反应性可能反映出当被观察的行为者在没有“目标”的情况下执行动作时,缺乏对其意图的归因。或者,这可能仅仅表明在观察者的经验中没有出现可预测后续轨迹的线索。为了验证这一假设,本研究调查了在没有物体的可预测但任意的动作的视觉经验作用下,眼动的时间进程是如何变化的。参与者在一个序列反应时任务中观察了一个模型执行连续手指动作的点光显示。在各个实验块中,眼动的反应性逐渐降低。此外,表现出更多预测性眼动的参与者随后在被要求执行或识别该序列时表现出更强的学习能力。参与者是否被告知观察到的动作是由人类还是杠杆产生的,对任何测量指标都没有影响。目前的数据表明,在观察没有物体的动作时,眼动反映了通过经验可预测轨迹的程度。我们将结合这些发现对支持有物体和无物体动作感知的机制以及介导无生命物体加工的机制的影响进行讨论。

相似文献

1
The time course of eye movements during action observation reflects sequence learning.动作观察期间眼动的时间进程反映了序列学习。
Neuroreport. 2013 Oct 2;24(14):822-6. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328364d5fd.
2
Why do the eyes prefer the index finger? Simultaneous recording of eye and hand movements during precision grasping.为什么眼睛更喜欢食指?精确抓握过程中眼睛和手部动作的同步记录。
J Vis. 2013 Apr 18;13(5):15. doi: 10.1167/13.5.15.
3
Magnifying visual target information and the role of eye movements in motor sequence learning.放大视觉目标信息及眼动在运动序列学习中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Jan;163:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
4
Effects of short-term experience on anticipatory eye movements during action observation.短期体验对动作观察期间预期眼动的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jan;233(1):69-77. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4091-x. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
5
Visuospatial perceptual sequence learning and eye movements.视觉空间感知序列学习与眼动
Exp Psychol. 2012 Jan 1;59(5):279-85. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000155.
6
Anticipation measures of sequence learning: manual versus oculomotor versions of the serial reaction time task.序列学习的预期测量:手动版与眼动版序列反应时任务
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Mar;70(3):579-589. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1172095. Epub 2016 May 3.
7
Effects of reward expectancy on sequential eye movements in monkeys.奖励预期对猴子连续眼动的影响。
Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1181-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.04.005. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
8
Higher visuo-Attentional Demands of Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) Lead to A Lower Precision in Pointing Movements.多目标跟踪(MOT)中更高的视觉注意力需求导致指向运动的精度降低。
J Gen Psychol. 2018 Apr-Jun;145(2):134-152. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2018.1437385. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
9
"Graspability" of objects affects gaze patterns during perception and action tasks.物体的“可抓握性”会影响感知和动作任务中的注视模式。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jul;212(2):177-87. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2716-x. Epub 2011 May 20.
10
People are unable to recognize or report on their own eye movements.人们无法识别或报告自己的眼球运动。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Nov;70(11):2251-2270. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1231208. Epub 2016 Oct 13.