Department of Radiology, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Med Sci Monit. 2013 Aug 26;19:703-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889032.
A risk factor assessment that reliably predicts whether patients are predisposed to intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture has yet to be formulated. As such, the clinical management of unruptured IA remains unclear. Our aim was to determine whether impaired arterial distensibility and hypertrophic remodeling might be indicators of risk for IA rupture.
MATERIAL/METHODS: The study population (n=49) was selected from consecutive admissions for either unruptured IA (n=23) or ruptured IA (n=26) from January to December 2010. Hemodynamic measures were taken from every patient, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure using a sphygmomanometer. Unruptured IA and ruptured IA characteristics, including aneurysmal shape, size, angle, aspect ratio, and bottleneck factor, were measured and calculated from transverse brain CT angiography images. With ultrasound, the right common carotid artery intima-media thickness was measured, as well as the lumen diameter during systole and diastole. Arterial wall strain, distensibility, stiffness index, and elastic modulus were calculated and compared between patients with unruptured IAs and ruptured IAs. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
General demographic data did not differ between patients with unruptured IAs and ruptured IAs. Greater mean intima-media thickness (p=0.013), mean stiffness index (p=0.044), and mean elastic modulus (p=0.026) were observed for patients with ruptured IAs. Moreover, mean strain (p=0.013) and mean distensibility (p=0.024) were decreased in patients with ruptured IAs.
Patients with ruptured IAs demonstrated decreased arterial distensibility and increased intima-media thickness at the level of the carotid arteries. By measuring these parameters via ultrasound, it may be possible to predict whether patients with existing IAs might rupture and hemorrhage into the subarachnoid space.
目前尚未形成一种能够可靠预测患者是否易患颅内动脉瘤(IA)破裂的风险因素评估方法。因此,未破裂的 IA 的临床处理仍不明确。我们的目的是确定动脉顺应性受损和肥厚性重构是否可能是 IA 破裂的风险指标。
材料/方法:该研究人群(n=49)是 2010 年 1 月至 12 月连续收治的未破裂 IA(n=23)或破裂 IA(n=26)患者中选出的。对每位患者进行血流动力学测量,包括使用血压计测量收缩压和舒张压。通过横断脑 CT 血管造影图像测量和计算未破裂 IA 和破裂 IA 的特征,包括动脉瘤的形状、大小、角度、纵横比和瓶颈因子。使用超声测量右侧颈总动脉内膜-中层厚度以及收缩期和舒张期的管腔直径。计算并比较未破裂 IA 患者和破裂 IA 患者的动脉壁应变、顺应性、僵硬指数和弹性模量。p 值小于 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
未破裂 IA 患者和破裂 IA 患者的一般人口统计学数据无差异。破裂 IA 患者的平均内膜-中层厚度(p=0.013)、平均僵硬指数(p=0.044)和平均弹性模量(p=0.026)更高。此外,破裂 IA 患者的平均应变(p=0.013)和平均顺应性(p=0.024)降低。
破裂 IA 患者的颈动脉水平动脉顺应性降低,内膜-中层厚度增加。通过超声测量这些参数,可能可以预测是否存在现有 IA 的患者可能会破裂并出血至蛛网膜下腔。