• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引言:分析理论与政治实践中的评价

Introduction: evaluation in analytic theory and political practice.

机构信息

Columbia University.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013 Dec;38(6):1071-9. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2373139. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-2373139
PMID:23974474
Abstract

The development of professional policy analysis was driven by a desire to apply "science" to policy decisions, but the vision of apolitical policy analysis is as unattainable today as it was at the inception of the field. While there is powerful evidence that schemes to "get around" politics are futile, they never seem to lose their popularity. The contemporary enthusiasm for health technology assessment and comparative-effectiveness research extends these efforts to find technical, bureaucratic fixes to the problem of health care costs. As the benefits and costs of health care continue to grow, so too will the search for analytic evidence and insights. It is important to recognize that the goal of these efforts should not be to eliminate but rather to enrich political deliberations that govern what societies pay for and get from their health care systems.

摘要

专业政策分析的发展是出于将“科学”应用于政策决策的愿望,但今天,正如该领域创立之初一样,实现非政治化政策分析的愿景是遥不可及的。虽然有强有力的证据表明,试图“规避”政治的做法是徒劳的,但它们似乎从未失去过人气。当前,人们热衷于进行卫生技术评估和比较效果研究,这使得人们试图寻找技术性、官僚性的解决方案来解决医疗成本问题。随着医疗保健的收益和成本不断增加,对分析证据和见解的需求也将不断增加。重要的是要认识到,这些努力的目标不应该是消除政治审议,而是要丰富政治审议,从而决定社会为其医疗保健系统支付的费用和获得的收益。

相似文献

1
Introduction: evaluation in analytic theory and political practice.引言:分析理论与政治实践中的评价
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013 Dec;38(6):1071-9. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2373139. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
2
A changing paradigm in the study and adoption of emerging health care technologies: coverage with evidence development.新兴医疗技术研究与应用中的范式转变:基于证据生成的覆盖范围
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Nov;5(11):1125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.06.008.
3
The impact of technology on health care cost and policy development.技术对医疗保健成本及政策制定的影响。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2008 Jul;18(3):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2008.01.007.
4
The politics of comparative effectiveness research: lessons from recent history.比较效果研究的政治学:近代历史的教训
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2014 Feb;39(1):139-70. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2395199. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
5
Health technology assessment.卫生技术评估
Q J Nucl Med. 2000 Jun;44(2):105-11.
6
Conditionally funded field evaluations: PATHs coverage with evidence development program for Ontario.有条件资助的现场评估:安大略省基于证据发展计划的PATHs覆盖情况
Value Health. 2010 Jun;13 Suppl 1:S8-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00747.x.
7
Lack of support for cost-utility analysis in the health care reform law: a case of ignorance or political posturing?《医疗改革法案》中对成本效益分析缺乏支持:是出于无知还是政治作秀?
Clin Ther. 2010 Jun;32(6):1091-2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.06.009.
8
Public health policy research: making the case for a political science approach.公共卫生政策研究:为政治学方法辩护。
Health Promot Int. 2011 Mar;26(1):109-16. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq079.
9
Health technology assessment and comparative effectiveness research: a pharmaceutical industry perspective.卫生技术评估和比较效果研究:制药行业视角。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Aug;13(4):447-54. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2013.815401.
10
The political dimension in health care technology assessment programs.医疗保健技术评估项目中的政治维度。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6(1):115-23. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300008977.