• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在当地卫生集成网络 4 区(LHIN 4)项目中的结直肠癌质量改进(QICC-L4):在一个大地理区域内的综合知识转化。

Quality improvement in colorectal cancer in local health integration network 4 (LHIN 4) project (QICC-L4): integrated knowledge translation in a large geographic region.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada,

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(13):4067-72. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3218-9. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-013-3218-9
PMID:23975323
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stakeholders suggest that integrating end users into the planning and execution of quality improvement interventions may more effectively close quality gaps. We tested if such an approach could improve the quality of colorectal cancer surgery in a large geographic region (i.e., LHIN4) in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

All LHIN4 surgeons who provide colorectal cancer surgery were invited to an October 2006 inaugural QICC-L4 workshop and subsequent workshops in 2008, 2010, and 2012. At workshops, surgeons selected clinically relevant quality markers for targeted improvement and interventions to achieve improvements. Selected markers included rates of colon and rectal radiology imaging, rate of pathology reporting of rectal radial margin distance, and rate of positive rectal radial margins. To date, implemented interventions have included audit and feedback, tailoring interviews to identify barriers and facilitators to optimal quality, and preoperative internet-based patient reviews. Hospital and regional cancer centre charts provide audit data for annual feedback reports to surgeons.

RESULTS

Participating surgeons at workshops and surgeon participants in preoperative reviews treated approximately 70 % of all LHIN4 patients undergoing colorectal surgery. For years 2006-2012, the rate of radiology imaging for colon and rectal cases increased from 70 to 91 % and from 71 to 91 %, respectively. For rectal cases, the rate of reporting radial margins increased (55-93 %), and the rate of positive radial margins decreased (14-6 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Initiation of the integrated knowledge translation QICC-L4 project in a large geographic region was associated with marked improvements in relevant colorectal cancer surgery quality markers.

摘要

背景

利益相关者认为,将终端用户纳入质量改进干预措施的规划和执行中,可能更有效地缩小质量差距。我们在加拿大安大略省一个较大的地理区域(即 LHIN4)测试了这种方法是否可以提高结直肠癌手术的质量。

方法

邀请所有在 LHIN4 提供结直肠癌手术的外科医生参加 2006 年 10 月的首届 QICC-L4 研讨会以及 2008 年、2010 年和 2012 年的后续研讨会。在研讨会上,外科医生选择了与临床相关的质量指标,以进行有针对性的改进,并采取干预措施以实现改进。选定的指标包括结肠和直肠影像学检查的比率、直肠放射状边缘距离的病理报告率以及直肠阳性放射状边缘的比率。迄今为止,实施的干预措施包括审计和反馈、量身定制访谈以确定实现最佳质量的障碍和促进因素,以及术前基于互联网的患者审查。医院和区域癌症中心的图表为外科医生提供年度反馈报告的审计数据。

结果

在研讨会上参加的外科医生和参加术前审查的外科医生治疗了大约 70%在 LHIN4 接受结直肠癌手术的所有患者。在 2006 年至 2012 年期间,结肠和直肠病例的影像学检查率分别从 70%增加到 91%和从 71%增加到 91%。对于直肠病例,报告放射状边缘的比率增加(55%-93%),阳性放射状边缘的比率降低(14%-6%)。

结论

在一个较大的地理区域启动综合知识转化 QICC-L4 项目与相关结直肠癌手术质量指标的显著改善有关。

相似文献

1
Quality improvement in colorectal cancer in local health integration network 4 (LHIN 4) project (QICC-L4): integrated knowledge translation in a large geographic region.在当地卫生集成网络 4 区(LHIN 4)项目中的结直肠癌质量改进(QICC-L4):在一个大地理区域内的综合知识转化。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(13):4067-72. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3218-9. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
2
Results of a surgeon-directed quality improvement project on breast cancer surgery outcomes in South-Central Ontario.安大略省中南部一项由外科医生主导的关于乳腺癌手术结果的质量改进项目的结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;21(7):2181-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3592-y. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
3
Development and implementation of a synoptic MRI report for preoperative staging of rectal cancer on a population-based level.基于人群的直肠癌术前分期的综合 MRI 报告的制定和实施。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Jun;57(6):700-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000123.
4
The implementation of a surgeon-directed quality improvement strategy in breast cancer surgery.一项由外科医生主导的乳腺癌手术质量改进策略的实施。
Am J Surg. 2014 Jul;208(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.032. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
5
Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.丹麦结直肠癌的生存情况
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4428.
6
An Internet-Based Collaborative Cancer Conference for Rectal Cancer Influenced Surgeon Treatment Recommendations.一场基于互联网的直肠癌协作癌症会议影响了外科医生的治疗建议。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;22(7):2143-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4216-2. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
7
High-Intensity vs Low-Intensity Knowledge Translation Interventions for Surgeons and Their Association With Process and Outcome Measures Among Patients Undergoing Rectal Cancer Surgery.高强度与低强度知识转化干预措施对接受直肠癌手术患者的外科医生及其与过程和结果测量的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2117536. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17536.
8
The Dutch surgical colorectal audit.荷兰外科结直肠审计。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;39(10):1063-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
9
The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer.在直肠癌治疗中引入全直肠系膜切除术后外科医生作为一个预后因素。
Br J Surg. 2002 Aug;89(8):1008-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02151.x.
10
Surgeon and hospital volume and the management of colorectal cancer patients in Australia.澳大利亚外科医生和医院的手术量与结直肠癌患者的管理
ANZ J Surg. 2005 Oct;75(10):901-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03543.x.

引用本文的文献

1
High- versus low-intensity knowledge translation interventions for surgeons and rates of local tumour recurrence after rectal cancer surgery: an Ontario study.针对外科医生的高强度与低强度知识转化干预措施及直肠癌手术后局部肿瘤复发率:一项安大略省的研究。
Can J Surg. 2025 Jun 18;68(3):E245-E252. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012424. Print 2025 May-Jun.
2
High-Intensity vs Low-Intensity Knowledge Translation Interventions for Surgeons and Their Association With Process and Outcome Measures Among Patients Undergoing Rectal Cancer Surgery.高强度与低强度知识转化干预措施对接受直肠癌手术患者的外科医生及其与过程和结果测量的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2117536. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17536.
3
A method to audit and score implementation of knowledge translation (KT) interventions in large health regions - an observational pilot study using rectal cancer surgery in Ontario.
一种审计和评分知识转化(KT)干预措施实施情况的方法——安大略省直肠癌手术的观察性试点研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05353-9.
4
Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.当地意见领袖:对专业实践和医疗结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 24;6(6):CD000125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000125.pub5.
5
The research activities of Ontario's large community acute care hospitals: a scoping review.安大略省大型社区急症护理医院的研究活动:一项范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 16;17(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2517-4.