Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2013 Dec;116:584-93. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2013.07.109. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
We report, to the best of our knowledge, for the first time the vibrational, IR and Raman, spectra of 12-thiacrown-4 (12t4) and 18-thiacrown-6 (18t6). To predict in what conformation 12t4 and 18t6 exist, for the vibrational analysis of both molecules and to assess the performance of the different computational methods for the accurate prediction of the vibrational frequencies of relatively large molecules, the computations were done using the harmonic and anharmonic force fields using the 6-31G* and 6-311G** basis sets. The computations were performed at the HF, B3LYP, CAM-B3LYP, BLYP, BP86, G96LYP, PBE1PBE, TPSSH and MP2 levels. Comparison was made between the calculated and experimental vibrational frequencies as indicated by the root-mean-square (rms) deviations, using either the unscaled and scaled harmonic vibrational frequencies and, unscaled, anharmonic vibrational frequencies. For the harmonic vibrational frequencies two scaling schemes were used. One uses one-scale-factor (1SF) scaling and the other uses 8SF scaling. In terms of the vibrational analysis of 12t4 and 18t6, the report confirms the solid state X-ray structure of D4 of 12t4 and C2 of 18t6. It is concluded that a lower rms deviation is obtained using 1SF scaled harmonic vibrational frequencies at even the HF/6-31G* level than using anharmonic vibrational frequencies at the MP2/6-311G** level. The CAM-B3LYP method showed some improvement over the traditional B3LYP method.
据我们所知,我们首次报道了 12-硫代冠-4(12t4)和 18-硫代冠-6(18t6)的振动、红外和拉曼光谱。为了预测 12t4 和 18t6 存在的构象,对两种分子的振动分析,并评估不同计算方法对相对较大分子振动频率的准确预测的性能,使用 6-31G和 6-311G**基组进行了谐波和非谐力场的计算。计算在 HF、B3LYP、CAM-B3LYP、BLYP、BP86、G96LYP、PBE1PBE、TPSSH 和 MP2 水平上进行。通过均方根(rms)偏差比较了计算和实验振动频率,使用未经缩放和缩放的谐波振动频率以及未经缩放的非谐波振动频率。对于谐波振动频率,使用了两种缩放方案。一种使用单比例因子(1SF)缩放,另一种使用 8SF 缩放。就 12t4 和 18t6 的振动分析而言,该报告证实了 12t4 的 D4 和 18t6 的 C2 的固态 X 射线结构。结论是,即使在 HF/6-31G 水平下,使用 1SF 缩放的谐波振动频率也比在 MP2/6-311G** 水平下使用非谐波振动频率获得更小的 rms 偏差。CAM-B3LYP 方法比传统的 B3LYP 方法有所改进。