• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仿制药上市后品牌名处方药的私人支出。

Private expenditures on brand name prescription drugs after generic entry.

作者信息

Balaban Dahlia Y, Dhalla Irfan A, Law Michael R, Bell Chaim M

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada,

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Oct;11(5):523-9. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0052-y.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-013-0052-y
PMID:23979876
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Generic drugs offer a less expensive and therapeutically equivalent alternative to brand name drugs. Nevertheless, many Canadian private drug plans continue to pay for brand name drugs even after generics become available.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to quantify the excess spending resulting from this practice.

METHODS

We used the IMS Brogan PharmaStat database to study private-plan drug spending in Ontario from 2000 to 2009. We focused on three widely used drug classes: proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. For each specific molecule, we determined the difference between what private plans spent on the brand name version and what would have been spent if an available generic version of the same molecule had been purchased instead.

RESULTS

We found that prescriptions paid for by private drug plans were often filled with brand name drugs after generics became available. This led to excess private spending of more than Can$107.8 million for these three drug classes over our study period: Can$54.4 million for PPIs, Can$32.4 million for SSRIs and Can$21.0 million for ACE inhibitors.

INTERPRETATION

Brand name drugs continue to be reimbursed by Canadian private drug plans at higher prices even after less expensive generic alternatives are available. By mandating generic substitution, substantial cost savings on benefit plans could be achieved.

摘要

背景

仿制药为品牌药提供了一种价格更低且治疗等效的替代选择。然而,即使仿制药已上市,许多加拿大私人药品计划仍继续为品牌药付费。

目的

本研究的目的是量化这种做法导致的额外支出。

方法

我们使用IMS Brogan PharmaStat数据库研究了2000年至2009年安大略省私人计划的药品支出。我们重点关注了三类广泛使用的药物:质子泵抑制剂(PPI)、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)和血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂。对于每种特定分子,我们确定了私人计划在品牌药版本上的支出与如果购买同一分子的可用仿制药版本所支出的费用之间的差异。

结果

我们发现,在仿制药上市后,由私人药品计划支付的处方通常仍使用品牌药。在我们的研究期间,这导致这三类药物的私人额外支出超过1.078亿加元:质子泵抑制剂为5440万加元,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂为3240万加元,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂为2100万加元。

解读

即使有价格更低的仿制药可供选择,加拿大私人药品计划仍继续以更高的价格报销品牌药。通过强制进行仿制药替代,可以在福利计划上实现大幅成本节约。

相似文献

1
Private expenditures on brand name prescription drugs after generic entry.仿制药上市后品牌名处方药的私人支出。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Oct;11(5):523-9. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0052-y.
2
Medicare Spending on Brand-name Combination Medications vs Their Generic Constituents.医疗保险支出在品牌组合药物与它们的通用成分上的对比。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):650-656. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.11439.
3
Cost variability of suggested generic treatment alternatives under the Medicare Part D benefit.医疗保险处方药福利下建议的通用治疗替代方案的成本变异性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Mar;20(3):283-90. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.3.283.
4
Impact of brand drug discount cards on private insurer, government and patient expenditures.品牌药折扣卡在私人保险公司、政府和患者支出方面的影响。
CMAJ. 2019 Nov 11;191(45):E1237-E1241. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190098.
5
Generic script share and the price of brand-name drugs: the role of consumer choice.仿制药共享与品牌药价格:消费者选择的作用。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2009 Sep;9(3):291-316. doi: 10.1007/s10754-008-9052-0. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
6
The effect of generic competition on the price of brand-name drugs.仿制药竞争对品牌药价格的影响。
Health Policy. 2004 Apr;68(1):47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.07.007.
7
Patient and Payer Incentives to Use Patented Brand-Name Drugs vs Authorized Generic Drugs in Medicare Part D.医疗保险计划 D 中患者和付款人的专利品牌药与授权仿制药使用激励因素
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Dec 1;181(12):1605-1611. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.5997.
8
Economic consequences of underuse of generic drugs: evidence from Medicaid and implications for prescription drug benefit plans.使用仿制药不足的经济后果:来自医疗补助计划的证据及对处方药福利计划的启示
Health Serv Res. 2003 Aug;38(4):1051-63. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00162.
9
Employer drug benefit plans and spending on prescription drugs.雇主药物福利计划与处方药支出
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1733-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1733.
10
Encouraging generic use can yield significant savings.鼓励使用仿制药可大幅节省成本。
Find Brief. 2012 Nov;15(8):1-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Bias within economic evaluations - the impact of considering the future entry of lower-cost generics on currently estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of a new drug.经济评估中的偏差——考虑低成本仿制药未来进入市场对新药当前估计的增量成本效益比的影响。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Oct 6;7:497-503. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S90386. eCollection 2015.