Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):612-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.058.
To assess the relationship between visceral obesity and perioperative parameters in patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 118 patients who underwent minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. On preoperative imaging, perinephric, visceral, and subcutaneous fat were measured. Higher estimated blood loss, complications, and warm ischemia time were used as surrogates of increased operation difficulty. We examined the association between the 3 groups of patients (ie low, medium, and high fat) with demographic and clinical characteristics. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine whether various measurements of obesity adversely affected surgical outcomes and complexity.
No statistically significant differences were found between perioperative parameters and either perinephric, visceral, or subcutaneous fat. There was no association between changes in renal function and different fat groups. Multivariate analysis for estimated blood loss, complication rates, and warm ischemia time adjusted for age, race, sex, nephrometry score, Charlson comorbidities score, and other fat types, failed to demonstrate any significant differences. Increasing perinephric fat content was associated with higher visceral (P <.0005), but not subcutaneous fat (P = .55). Hypertension was associated with perinephric (P = .02) and visceral (P = .04), but not subcutaneous obesity (P = .08). Neither Charlson comorbidity nor American Society of Anesthesiologists scores showed any significant association with different fat types.
Individual patterns of obesity, namely subcutaneous, visceral, and perinephric, do not increase surgical complexity for minimally invasive partial nephrectomy by experienced surgeons. Furthermore, this operation can be performed safely with comparable complications and outcomes in moderately obese patients without compromising renal function.
评估腹腔镜或机器人辅助部分肾切除术患者内脏肥胖与围手术期参数之间的关系。
我们回顾性分析了 118 例行微创部分肾切除术患者的病历。术前影像学检查测量肾周、内脏和皮下脂肪。较高的估计失血量、并发症和热缺血时间被用作手术难度增加的替代指标。我们检查了 3 组患者(即低、中、高脂肪组)与人口统计学和临床特征之间的关系。进行多变量分析以确定肥胖的各种测量值是否对手术结果和复杂性产生不利影响。
围手术期参数与肾周、内脏或皮下脂肪之间无统计学差异。肾功能变化与不同脂肪组之间无关联。调整年龄、种族、性别、肾肿瘤评分、Charlson 合并症评分和其他脂肪类型后,对估计失血量、并发症发生率和热缺血时间进行多变量分析,未能显示出任何显著差异。肾周脂肪含量的增加与内脏脂肪(P<0.0005)有关,但与皮下脂肪(P=0.55)无关。高血压与肾周(P=0.02)和内脏(P=0.04)有关,但与皮下肥胖无关(P=0.08)。Charlson 合并症评分和美国麻醉师协会评分均与不同的脂肪类型无显著相关性。
经验丰富的外科医生进行微创部分肾切除术时,个体肥胖模式,即皮下、内脏和肾周肥胖,并不会增加手术复杂性。此外,在不影响肾功能的情况下,中度肥胖患者可以安全地进行该手术,并且具有可比的并发症和结果。