Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Hayes House, 75 George Street, Oxford OX1 2BQ, UK.
Anim Health Res Rev. 2013 Dec;14(2):159-62. doi: 10.1017/S146625231300008X. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
Global food security, livestock production and animal health are inextricably bound. However, our focus on the future tends to disaggregate food and health into largely separate domains. Indeed, much foresight work is either food systems or health-based with little overlap in terms of predictions or narratives. Work on animal health is no exception. Part of the problem is the fundamental misunderstanding of the role, nature and impact of the modern futures tool kit. Here, I outline three key issues in futures research ranging from methodological confusion over the application of scenarios to the failure to effectively integrate multiple methodologies to the gap between the need for more evidence and power and control over futures processes. At its core, however, a better understanding of the narrative and worldview framing much of the futures work in animal health is required to enhance the value and impact of such exercises.
全球粮食安全、畜牧业生产和动物健康紧密相关。然而,我们对未来的关注往往将食品和健康割裂成截然不同的领域。实际上,许多前瞻性工作要么基于食品系统,要么基于健康,在预测或叙述方面几乎没有重叠。动物健康方面的工作也不例外。部分问题在于对现代未来工具包的作用、性质和影响存在根本误解。在这里,我概述了未来研究中的三个关键问题,包括情景应用中的方法学混淆、未能有效整合多种方法以及对未来过程的证据和权力与控制的需求之间的差距。然而,核心问题是需要更好地理解叙事和世界观,这是动物健康领域未来工作的重要组成部分,以提高此类工作的价值和影响力。