Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Institute of Pathology, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.
Oral Oncol. 2013 Nov;49(11):1077-82. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
To evaluate the impact of margin sampling on local recurrence in patients with pT1-2 pN0 conventional squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue.
Based on margin sampling, 126 cases were divided into group 1 (margins sampled from the glossectomy specimen only), group 2 (with revision of glossectomy margins), and group 3 (margins primarily sampled from the tumor bed).
The probability of local progression-free survival at 3years was .90, .76 and .73 (p=.0389) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Groups differed by frequency of positive glossectomy specimen margins (p=<.0001) and by the average distance from carcinoma to the closest margin (4.5, 2.4, and 3.0mm for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p=.0009). Tumor bed margin status (positive vs. negative) and other parameters (e.g., pattern and depth of invasion) did not correlate with local recurrence. Status of the glossectomy specimen margins did correlate with outcome. A positive glossectomy margin conferred a relative risk of 2.5 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1 - 6.3) for local recurrence. A proportional hazards regression model for margin width found a hazard ratio of 0.67 (95% CI=.57-.98) comparable to a 33% decrease in risk of local recurrence for an increase of 1mm of margin width (p=.0271).
Status of the glossectomy specimen margins rather than that of tumor bed margins was prognostically relevant. Reliance on tumor bed margins appears to be associated with worse local control, perhaps due to the narrower initial resection.
评估在 pT1-2 pN0 常规口腔舌鳞癌患者中,切缘取样对局部复发的影响。
基于切缘取样,将 126 例患者分为 1 组(仅从舌切除标本中取样切缘)、2 组(修改舌切除切缘)和 3 组(主要从肿瘤床取样切缘)。
3 年无局部进展生存率分别为 0.90、0.76 和 0.73(p=0.0389),分别为 1 组、2 组和 3 组。各组之间的阳性舌切除标本切缘频率不同(p<.0001),且癌与最近切缘之间的平均距离不同(分别为 4.5、2.4 和 3.0mm;p=0.0009)。肿瘤床切缘状态(阳性 vs. 阴性)和其他参数(如浸润模式和深度)与局部复发无关。舌切除标本切缘状态与结局相关。阳性舌切除标本切缘的相对风险为 2.5(95%置信区间,CI,1-6.3),局部复发的风险增加 1mm 时,比例风险回归模型的危险比为 0.67(95%CI=.57-.98),相当于局部复发风险降低 33%(p=.0271)。
舌切除标本切缘的状态而非肿瘤床切缘的状态与预后相关。依赖肿瘤床切缘似乎与局部控制较差有关,这可能是由于初始切除较窄。