Front Foot Communications Ltd; Bourne, UK.
GM Crops Food. 2013 Jul-Dec;4(3):143-50. doi: 10.4161/gmcr.26303. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
The rapid uptake of biotech crops around the world demonstrates not only strong producer and consumer demand for the technology and its products, but also that where regulatory regimes function effectively and markets are allowed to operate as normal, co-existence between genetically modified (GM) and non-GM supply chains is readily achievable. However, the polarized debate over GMOs within the European Union over the past 15 years has resulted in a highly politicized and progressively impractical approach to the issue of GM crop co-existence, which in itself has become a further barrier to the technology's development. This article argues that co-existence should not be treated as a pro- or anti-GM issue, and that the aim of co-existence measures should be to permit consumer choice and freedom to operate whatever the production method involved. It suggests that supply chain-based solutions to co-existence, rather than Government prescription, offer the most pragmatic and flexible response to the commercial realities of servicing differentiated market demands.
生物技术作物在全球范围内的快速采用不仅表明了生产者和消费者对该技术及其产品的强烈需求,而且还表明,在监管制度有效运作且市场正常运作的情况下,转基因(GM)和非转基因供应链之间的共存是很容易实现的。然而,在过去 15 年里,欧盟内部围绕转基因生物的两极化辩论导致了对转基因作物共存问题的高度政治化和日益不切实际的处理方式,而这本身已成为该技术发展的另一个障碍。本文认为,共存不应该被视为支持或反对转基因生物的问题,共存措施的目的应该是允许消费者选择和自由运作,无论所涉及的生产方法如何。它建议,基于供应链的共存解决方案,而不是政府规定,为满足差异化市场需求的商业现实提供了最务实和灵活的应对方式。