Suppr超能文献

在中国汉族人群中,遗传变异与单纯空腹高血糖和单纯餐后高血糖的关联。

Association of genetic variants with isolated fasting hyperglycaemia and isolated postprandial hyperglycaemia in a Han Chinese population.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Diabetes Prevention and Control, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Aug 19;8(8):e71399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071399. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Though multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with type 2 diabetes have been identified, the genetic bases of isolated fasting hyperglycaemia (IFH) and isolated postprandial hyperglycaemia (IPH) were still unclear. In present study, we aimed to investigate the association of genome-wide association study-validated genetic variants and IFH or IPH in Han Chinese.

METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We genotyped 27 validated SNPs in 6,663 unrelated individuals comprising 341 IFH, 865 IPH, 1,203 combined fasting hyperglycaemia and postprandial hyperglycaemia, and 4,254 normal glycaemic subjects of Han ancestry. The distributions of genotype frequencies of FTO, CDKAL1 and GCKR were significant different between individuals with IFH and those with IPH (SNP(ptrend ): rs8050136(0.0024), rs9939609(0.0049), rs7756992(0.0122), rs780094(0.0037)). Risk allele of FTO specifically increased the risk of IFH (rs8050136: OR 1.403 [95% CI 1.125-1.750], p = 0.0027; rs9939609: 1.398 [1.120-1.744], p = 0.0030). G allele of CDKAL1 specifically increased the risk of IPH (1.217 [1.092-1.355], p = 0.0004). G allele of GCKR increased the risk of IFH (1.167 [0.999-1.362], p = 0.0513), but decreased the risk of IPH (0.891 [0.801-0.991], p = 0.0331). In addition, TCF7L2 and KCNQ1 increased the risk of both IFH and IPH. When combined, each additional risk allele associated with IFH increased the risk for IFH by 1.246-fold (p<0.0001), while each additional risk allele associated with IPH increased the risk for IPH by 1.190-fold (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results indicate that genotype distributions of variants from FTO, GCKR, CDKAL1 were different between IPH and IFH in Han Chinese. Variants of genes modulating insulin sensitivity (FTO, GCKR) contributed to the risk of IFH, while variants of genes related to beta cell function (CDKAL1) increase the risk of IPH.

摘要

背景

尽管已经发现了多种与 2 型糖尿病相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP),但孤立性空腹高血糖(IFH)和孤立性餐后高血糖(IPH)的遗传基础仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们旨在研究经全基因组关联研究验证的遗传变异与汉族人群 IFH 或 IPH 的相关性。

方法/主要发现:我们对 6635 名无血缘关系的个体进行了 27 个经全基因组关联研究验证的 SNP 基因分型,这些个体包括 341 名 IFH 患者、865 名 IPH 患者、1203 名空腹和餐后高血糖合并患者和 4254 名血糖正常的汉族个体。FTO、CDKAL1 和 GCKR 基因的基因型频率分布在 IFH 患者和 IPH 患者之间存在显著差异(SNP(ptrend):rs8050136(0.0024),rs9939609(0.0049),rs7756992(0.0122),rs780094(0.0037))。FTO 的风险等位基因特异性增加了 IFH 的风险(rs8050136:OR 1.403 [95% CI 1.125-1.750],p=0.0027;rs9939609:1.398 [1.120-1.744],p=0.0030)。CDKAL1 的 G 等位基因特异性增加了 IPH 的风险(1.217 [1.092-1.355],p=0.0004)。GCKR 的 G 等位基因增加了 IFH 的风险(1.167 [0.999-1.362],p=0.0513),但降低了 IPH 的风险(0.891 [0.801-0.991],p=0.0331)。此外,TCF7L2 和 KCNQ1 增加了 IFH 和 IPH 的风险。当联合时,每个与 IFH 相关的额外风险等位基因使 IFH 的风险增加 1.246 倍(p<0.0001),而每个与 IPH 相关的额外风险等位基因使 IPH 的风险增加 1.190 倍(p<0.0001)。

结论/意义:我们的结果表明,汉族人群中 IFH 和 IPH 之间 FTO、GCKR、CDKAL1 基因变异的基因型分布不同。调节胰岛素敏感性的基因(FTO、GCKR)的变异导致 IFH 的风险增加,而与β细胞功能相关的基因(CDKAL1)的变异增加了 IPH 的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea7b/3747192/ed99e88f0e3c/pone.0071399.g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验