Massa J S, Blask D E
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1990 Oct;195(1):119-22. doi: 10.3181/00379727-195-43128.
Pinealectomy in the female golden Syrian hamster is not always completely effective in preventing the suppressive effects of long-term light deprivation due to blinding on pituitary prolactin (PRL) cell activity. We examined this curious phenomenon by measuring pituitary PRL mRNA levels, PRL synthesis, and radioimmunoassayable PRL, and correlating these changes with the status of estrous cyclicity. As expected, 12 weeks of light deprivation resulted in loss of estrous cyclicity and a greater than 90% decline in all indices of pituitary PRL cell activity, compared with intact cycling controls. Pinealectomy prevented only 40-50% of this decline. However, if noncycling light-deprived pinealectomized animals were excluded, pinealectomy was completely effective, i.e., cycling intact control animals were no different than cycling blind-pinealectomized. We conclude that the inability of pinealectomy to completely prevent the decline in prolactin cell activity seen after blinding is due to the loss of estrous cyclicity in some blind-pinealectomized females, with the attendant loss of the prolactin-stimulating hormone estrogen.
对雌性叙利亚金黄地鼠进行松果体切除,并不总能完全有效地防止因致盲导致的长期光照剥夺对垂体催乳素(PRL)细胞活性的抑制作用。我们通过测量垂体PRL mRNA水平、PRL合成以及可进行放射免疫测定的PRL,并将这些变化与动情周期状态相关联,来研究这一奇特现象。正如预期的那样,与完整的动情周期对照组相比,12周的光照剥夺导致动情周期丧失,垂体PRL细胞活性的所有指标下降超过90%。松果体切除仅能防止这种下降的40 - 50%。然而,如果排除非动情周期的光照剥夺松果体切除动物,松果体切除是完全有效的,即完整的动情周期对照动物与动情周期的致盲松果体切除动物没有差异。我们得出结论,松果体切除不能完全防止致盲后催乳素细胞活性下降,是因为一些致盲松果体切除雌性动物动情周期丧失,随之失去了刺激催乳素的激素雌激素。