Institute of Oncology Ion Chiricuta, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, 400015, Romania.
Lung Cancer. 2013 Nov;82(2):276-81. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
Molecularly targeted agents for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can provide similar efficacy to chemotherapy without chemotherapy-associated toxicities. Combining two agents with different modes of action could further increase the efficacy of these therapies. The TASK study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib in combination with the anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab as first-line therapy in unselected, advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients.
Patients were recruited from December 2007 to September 2008. Planned sample size was 200 patients, a total of 124 patients were randomized. Patients were randomized using a minimization algorithm 1:1 to receive bevacizumab (iv 15 mg/kg day 1 of each 21-day cycle) plus chemotherapy (gemcitabine/cisplatin or carboplatin/paclitaxel standard doses, 4-6 cycles) (BC arm) or bevacizumab plus erlotinib (p.o. 150 mg/day; BE arm) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). If the hazard ratio (HR) of PFS for BE relative to BC was above 1.25 at the pre-planned interim analysis in favor of BC, the study would be re-evaluated. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, response rate and safety.
All randomized patients (n = 63 BE; n = 61 BC) were evaluated for the efficacy analyses. At the updated interim analysis, median PFS was 18.4 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.0-25.1) versus 25.0 weeks (95% CI 20.6-[not reached]) for BE versus BC, respectively (HR for death or disease progression, BE relative to BC, 2.05, p = 0.0183). The incidence of death was 19% for BE treatment compared with 11.5% for BC treatment. The HR for PFS at the updated interim analysis was above 1.25, therefore patients on the BE arm were permitted to change arms or switch to another drug and the study was terminated. Adverse events reported were as expected.
The TASK study did not show a benefit in terms of PFS for the combination of erlotinib with bevacizumab in unselected first-line advanced non-squamous NSCLC compared with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab.
针对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的分子靶向药物在不具有化疗相关毒性的情况下,可提供与化疗相似的疗效。联合使用两种作用模式不同的药物可进一步提高这些疗法的疗效。TASK 研究评估了表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂厄洛替尼联合抗血管生成药物贝伐珠单抗作为未经选择的晚期非鳞状 NSCLC 患者一线治疗的疗效和安全性。
患者于 2007 年 12 月至 2008 年 9 月入组。计划样本量为 200 例,共随机分配了 124 例患者。采用最小化算法 1:1 将患者随机分配接受贝伐珠单抗(iv 15mg/kg,每 21 天周期的第 1 天)加化疗(吉西他滨/顺铂或卡铂/紫杉醇标准剂量,4-6 个周期)(BC 组)或贝伐珠单抗加厄洛替尼(p.o.150mg/天;BE 组),直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。如果 BE 相对于 BC 的 PFS 风险比(HR)在有利于 BC 的预设中期分析中大于 1.25,则将重新评估该研究。次要终点包括总生存期、缓解率和安全性。
所有随机患者(n=63 例 BE;n=61 例 BC)均进行了疗效分析。在更新的中期分析中,中位 PFS 分别为 18.4 周(95%置信区间 [CI] 17.0-25.1)和 25.0 周(95% CI 20.6-[未达到]),BE 相对于 BC(死亡或疾病进展的 HR,BE 相对于 BC,2.05,p=0.0183)。BE 治疗的死亡率为 19%,而 BC 治疗的死亡率为 11.5%。在更新的中期分析中,PFS 的 HR 大于 1.25,因此允许 BE 臂的患者改变治疗方案或改用其他药物,并终止了研究。报告的不良事件与预期一致。
与化疗联合贝伐珠单抗相比,厄洛替尼联合贝伐珠单抗在未经选择的一线晚期非鳞状 NSCLC 患者中并未显示出在 PFS 方面的获益。