• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同管理的老年骨折中心的实施减少了老年股骨颈骨折患者的住院时间和手术时间。

Implementation of a co-managed Geriatric Fracture Center reduces hospital stay and time-to-operation in elderly femoral neck fracture patients.

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Klinikum Nuernberg, Breslauer Str. 201, 90471, Nuremberg, Germany,

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Nov;133(11):1527-31. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1845-z. Epub 2013 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-013-1845-z
PMID:23995550
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate changes in hospital length-of-stay and time-to-operation of older hip fracture patients before and after the foundation of a co-managed Geriatric Fracture Center (GFC).

METHODS

A co-managed GFC was established in a German level-1 trauma center. In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed femoral neck fracture patients >60 years treated with hemiarthroplasty. Patients treated within the first year after foundation of the GFC were compared to the patients treated during the year before. One-way ANOVA was performed to identify differences regarding time-to-operation and hospital length-of-stay.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen patients of the GFC were compared to 169 patients previously treated without co-management. Mean patient age did not significantly differ (81.9 vs. 81.5 years; p = 0.7), nor did gender distribution. Hospital length-of-stay was significantly shorter after foundation of the GFC (13.9 vs. 16.8 days; p = 0.007). The same is true for the interval between hospital admission and operation, which decreased from 3.1 to 2.1 days (p = 0.029). Early surgical complication rate was not significantly affected by GFC foundation (7.7 % pre-GFC vs. 9.6 % GFC; p = 0.6), nor was inpatient mortality (5.9 % pre-GFC vs. 4.4 % GFC; p = 0.6). Subgroup analysis revealed that GFC patients without early surgical complications displayed a reduced length-of-stay (LOS), whereas LOS was even prolonged in GFC patients with surgical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

A co-managed GFC offering an organized fracture program for the elderly can reduce hospital length-of-stay and time-to-operation in hip fracture patients. A significant effect can be observed within the first year after establishment of a GFC.

摘要

目的

评估老年髋部骨折患者在共管老年骨折中心(GFC)成立前后的住院时间和手术时间的变化。

方法

在德国一级创伤中心建立了共管 GFC。在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了接受人工股骨头置换术治疗的>60 岁股骨颈骨折患者。将 GFC 成立后第一年接受治疗的患者与前一年接受治疗的患者进行比较。采用单因素方差分析比较手术时间和住院时间的差异。

结果

114 名 GFC 患者与 169 名未接受共管治疗的患者进行了比较。患者年龄无显著差异(81.9 岁比 81.5 岁;p=0.7),性别分布也无差异。GFC 成立后住院时间明显缩短(13.9 天比 16.8 天;p=0.007)。从入院到手术的间隔时间也从 3.1 天缩短至 2.1 天(p=0.029),这同样是 GFC 成立的结果。GFC 成立并未显著影响早期手术并发症发生率(GFC 前为 7.7%,GFC 为 9.6%;p=0.6),住院死亡率也无差异(GFC 前为 5.9%,GFC 为 4.4%;p=0.6)。亚组分析显示,无早期手术并发症的 GFC 患者的住院时间缩短(LOS),而 GFC 有手术并发症的患者的 LOS 甚至延长。

结论

管理老年骨折患者的共管 GFC 可缩短髋部骨折患者的住院时间和手术时间。在 GFC 成立后的第一年可以观察到显著的效果。

相似文献

1
Implementation of a co-managed Geriatric Fracture Center reduces hospital stay and time-to-operation in elderly femoral neck fracture patients.共同管理的老年骨折中心的实施减少了老年股骨颈骨折患者的住院时间和手术时间。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Nov;133(11):1527-31. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1845-z. Epub 2013 Sep 1.
2
Impact of a comanaged Geriatric Fracture Center on short-term hip fracture outcomes.共同管理的老年骨折中心对髋部骨折短期预后的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Oct 12;169(18):1712-7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.321.
3
Measures of clinical outcome before, during, and after implementation of a comprehensive geriatric hip fracture program: is there a learning curve?在全面老年髋部骨折计划实施前后的临床结果测量:是否存在学习曲线?
J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Dec;27(12):672-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318291f0e5.
4
Fractures of the femoral neck: a review and personal statement.股骨颈骨折:综述与个人观点
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006;73(1):45-59.
5
Auckland City Hospital's ortho-geriatric service: an audit of patients aged over 65 with fractured neck of femur.奥克兰市医院的老年骨科服务:对65岁以上股骨颈骨折患者的审计
N Z Med J. 2011 Jun 24;124(1337):40-54.
6
Hip fracture outcomes: does surgeon or hospital volume really matter?髋部骨折的治疗结果:外科医生或医院的手术量真的重要吗?
J Trauma. 2009 Mar;66(3):809-14. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31816166bb.
7
[Replacement of the femoral head due to fracture of the hip: prognostic factors for the duration of hospitalisation, institutionalisation and mortality].[因髋部骨折进行股骨头置换:住院时间、机构护理时间及死亡率的预后因素]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Dec 13;147(50):2483-7.
8
Anticoagulation management in individuals with hip fracture.髋部骨折患者的抗凝管理。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Jan;62(1):159-64. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12591. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
9
Can geriatric hip fractures be managed effectively within a level 1 trauma center?一级创伤中心能否有效处理老年髋部骨折?
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Mar;29(3):160-4. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000257.
10
Risk factors for early infection following hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture.老年股骨颈骨折患者半髋关节置换术后早期感染的危险因素
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Apr;45(2):207-212. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0909-8. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Waiting time and 30-day mortality association in elderly patients having hip fracture surgery.老年髋部骨折手术患者的等待时间与30天死亡率的关联
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03140-z.
2
Length of hospital stay and readmissions after major lower extremity amputation: a Danish nationwide registry study.下肢大截肢术后的住院时间和再入院情况:一项丹麦全国性登记研究
Acta Orthop. 2024 Dec 23;95:737-743. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42637.
3
Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Proximal Hip Fracture: A Comparison of Orthopedic and Geriatric Care Models.
近端髋部骨折的围手术期和术后结果:骨科与老年护理模式的比较
Cureus. 2024 Jul 31;16(7):e65899. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65899. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Evaluation of Systemwide Improvement Programs to Optimize Time to Surgery for Patients With Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review.系统改进项目以优化髋部骨折患者手术时间的评估:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31911.
5
Effectiveness of Perioperative Comprehensive Evaluation of Hip Fracture in the Elderly.老年髋部骨折围手术期综合评估的效果。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 5;2022:4124354. doi: 10.1155/2022/4124354. eCollection 2022.
6
All-cause mortality risk in aged femoral intertrochanteric fracture patients.老年股骨转子间骨折患者的全因死亡率风险。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 20;16(1):727. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02874-9.
7
Effects of Orthogeriatric Care Models on Outcomes of Hip Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年骨科护理模式对髋部骨折患者结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2022 Feb;110(2):162-184. doi: 10.1007/s00223-021-00913-5. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
8
A Bibliometric Analysis of Fragility Fractures: Top 50.脆性骨折的文献计量分析:前 50 名
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jun 21;57(6):639. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060639.
9
Does Comanagement of Patients With Hip Fracture Influence 30-Day Outcomes.髋部骨折患者的共同管理是否会影响30天的治疗结果?
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020 Jan 30;11:2151459320901997. doi: 10.1177/2151459320901997. eCollection 2020.
10
The impact of an orthogeriatric intervention in patients with fragility fractures: a cohort study.老年骨科干预对脆性骨折患者的影响:一项队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1299-4.