Suppr超能文献

室间隔完整型肺动脉闭锁的杂交治疗方法:单中心早期结果及与标准手术治疗方法的比较

Hybrid approach for pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum: early single center results and comparison to the standard surgical approach.

作者信息

Zampi Jeffrey D, Hirsch-Romano Jennifer C, Goldstein Bryan H, Shaya Justin A, Armstrong Aimee K

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr 1;83(5):753-61. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25181. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine acute and mid-term patient outcomes following the hybrid approach to pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PA-IVS) compared with the standard surgical approach.

BACKGROUND

A subset of PA-IVS patients with the prospect of biventricular circulation typically undergo surgical or transcatheter right ventricular (RV) outflow tract opening. A recently described hybrid procedure, involving perventricular pulmonary valve perforation, was shown to be safe and effective in single-center series.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of all patient with PA-IVS who underwent either surgical or hybrid RV decompression between January 2002 and December 2011 was completed and acute and mid-term patient outcomes were compared between the surgical and hybrid cohorts. Additionally, a systematic literature review was completed to compare a transcatheter cohort to the hybrid cohort.

RESULTS

Seven patients with PA-IVS underwent a hybrid procedure; the procedure was technically successful in all attempts, and none required CPB. No patients required surgical re-intervention prior to hospital discharge, and none died during the study period. Surgical RV decompression was performed in 17 patients with a median CPB time of 80 min. Patient outcomes were nearly identical between cohorts. By systematic review, the transcatheter approach has a procedural success of 75-95% but up to 75% of patients require operation in the neonatal period.

CONCLUSIONS

The hybrid approach is a safe and feasible alternative to the standard surgical and transcatheter approaches to PA-IVS. Acute and mid-term patient outcomes are comparable with those treated with a standard surgical approach and neonatal CPB is completely avoided.

摘要

目的

比较采用杂交手术治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁(PA-IVS)与标准手术治疗后的急性和中期患者结局。

背景

一部分有望实现双心室循环的PA-IVS患者通常会接受手术或经导管右心室(RV)流出道开通术。最近描述的一种杂交手术,包括经心室壁肺动脉瓣穿孔术,在单中心系列研究中显示是安全有效的。

方法

对2002年1月至2011年12月期间接受手术或杂交RV减压的所有PA-IVS患者进行单中心回顾性研究,并比较手术组和杂交组的急性和中期患者结局。此外,完成了一项系统的文献综述,以比较经导管治疗组和杂交治疗组。

结果

7例PA-IVS患者接受了杂交手术;所有尝试在技术上均成功,且无一例需要体外循环。住院期间无患者需要再次手术干预,研究期间无患者死亡。17例患者接受了手术RV减压,体外循环时间中位数为80分钟。两组患者的结局几乎相同。通过系统综述发现,经导管治疗方法的手术成功率为75%-95%,但高达75%的患者在新生儿期需要接受手术。

结论

对于PA-IVS,杂交手术是标准手术和经导管手术的一种安全可行的替代方法。急性和中期患者结局与标准手术治疗相当,且完全避免了新生儿体外循环。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验