Manhem Stina, Odermarsky Michal, Wåhlander Håkan, Ekman-Joelsson Britt-Marie
Department of Pediatrics, Institution for Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Cardiology, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Behandlingsvägen 7, 416 50, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2024 Jul 5. doi: 10.1007/s00246-024-03566-x.
This study aimed to compare long-term morbidity in patients with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum (PA-IVS) treated with catheter-based intervention (group A) versus those undergoing heart surgery (group B) as initial intervention. Additionally, we conducted a systematic literature review on PA-IVS treatment. All neonates born in Sweden with PA-IVS between 2007 and 2019 were screened for inclusion. The inclusion criterion was decompression of the right ventricle for initial intervention. Medical records were reviewed, as well as the initial preoperative angiogram, and the diagnostic echocardiogram. Comparisons between groups were performed with Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher´s exact test. A systematic literature review of original studies regarding treatment of PA-IVS (2002 and onward) was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, to assess the outcomes of patients with PA-IVS. 34 (11 females) patients were included, 18 in group A and 16 in group B. There was no mortality in either group. Follow-up time ranged from 2 to 15 years (median 9). All attempted perforations in group A were successful, and 16 out of 18 patients reached biventricular circulation. In the surgical group 15 out of 16 patients reached biventricular circulation. The literature review presented heterogeneity in standards for treatment. This retrospective population-based multicenter study demonstrates that both catheter-based intervention and heart surgery are safe procedures. Our results are comparable to, or exceed, those in the systematic literature review. The systematic literature review displays a great heterogeneity in study design, with no definitive golden standard treatment.
本研究旨在比较采用导管介入治疗(A组)与接受心脏手术(B组)作为初始干预的室间隔完整型肺动脉闭锁(PA-IVS)患者的长期发病率。此外,我们还对PA-IVS治疗进行了系统的文献综述。对2007年至2019年在瑞典出生的所有患有PA-IVS的新生儿进行筛选以纳入研究。纳入标准是将右心室减压作为初始干预措施。对病历、初始术前血管造影和诊断性超声心动图进行了回顾。采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Fisher精确检验进行组间比较。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,对2002年及以后关于PA-IVS治疗的原始研究进行了系统的文献综述,以评估PA-IVS患者的治疗结果。共纳入34例患者(11例女性),A组18例,B组16例。两组均无死亡病例。随访时间为2至15年(中位数9年)。A组所有尝试的穿孔均成功,18例患者中有16例实现了双心室循环。手术组16例患者中有15例实现了双心室循环。文献综述显示治疗标准存在异质性。这项基于人群的回顾性多中心研究表明,导管介入治疗和心脏手术都是安全的手术方法。我们的结果与系统文献综述中的结果相当或更优。系统文献综述显示研究设计存在很大异质性,没有明确的金标准治疗方法。