Chakranarayan Ashish, Mukherjee B
Division of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Centre, INHS Kalyani, Eastern Naval Command, Visakhapatnam, 530005 AP India.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012 Sep;11(3):328-32. doi: 10.1007/s12663-011-0261-6. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
Contemporary opinion strongly concurs that isolated intracapsular fractures, in almost every instance, should be treated solely with physical therapy. Based on the premise that although these fractures can result in significant anatomic/radiologic changes in the appearance of the condyle itself, most patients with these fractures recover very well if adequately rehabilitated. However, in our study four cases of high condylar head (diacapitular) fractures were managed by surgically removing the fractured condylar head as it was obstructing mandibular function.
The retrospective analytical study was carried out at the Division of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Surgery, INHS Kalyani, Vishakhapatnam from Jul 2008 to Aug 2010. Patients who were clinically and radiologically diagnosed with high condylar head/neck fracture who did not respond to conservative management of active mouth opening exercises even after 2-3 weeks of physiotherapy and continued to have no improvement in mouth opening although the occlusion was stable were included in this study. The fractured condylar head was surgically removed and function restored.
A total of four cases, four males with high condylar head fractures were taken up for removal of the fractured condylar segment. In all cases satisfactory mouth opening was achieved intraoperatively. One case presented with troublesome intraoperative bleed.
The decision influencing open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction is based on the ability to restore function and esthetics. There are strong recommendations for conservatively managing the so called intracapsular or Neff's fractures. However, if the fracture segment is small and yet is causing restriction in mouth opening and inability to achieve desired occlusion we recommend removal of the fractured condylar segment. In this procedure the proximal segment is removed surgically and mouth opening is assessed. The occlusal discrepancy if any is managed subsequently using elastic traction on previously placed arch bars.
In our experience in those cases where the mouth opening continues to be restricted even after physiotherapy and a radiologically wedged segment is observed, removal of the fractured condylar segment to achieve mouth opening and subsequently managing the occlusion may prove to be beneficial to the patient.
当代观点一致强烈认为,几乎在所有情况下,孤立的囊内骨折都应仅采用物理治疗。基于这样一个前提,即尽管这些骨折会导致髁突本身在解剖学/放射学外观上出现显著变化,但如果得到充分康复,大多数此类骨折患者恢复得很好。然而,在我们的研究中,有4例高位髁头(双髁)骨折患者因骨折的髁头阻碍下颌功能而通过手术切除进行治疗。
这项回顾性分析研究于2008年7月至2010年8月在维沙卡帕特南的INHS卡利亚尼牙科外科学系口腔颌面外科进行。临床和放射学诊断为高位髁头/颈部骨折且即使经过2至3周物理治疗后积极开口练习的保守治疗仍无反应、尽管咬合稳定但开口仍无改善的患者纳入本研究。通过手术切除骨折的髁头并恢复功能。
共有4例男性高位髁头骨折患者接受了骨折髁突段切除术。所有病例术中均实现了满意的开口。1例术中出现棘手的出血情况。
影响切开复位内固定与闭合复位的决定基于恢复功能和美观的能力。对于所谓的囊内或内夫氏骨折,有强烈的保守治疗建议。然而,如果骨折段较小但仍导致开口受限且无法实现理想的咬合,我们建议切除骨折的髁突段。在此手术中,近端骨折段通过手术切除,然后评估开口情况。如有任何咬合差异,随后使用先前放置的牙弓夹板上的弹性牵引进行处理。
根据我们的经验,在那些即使经过物理治疗开口仍受限且观察到放射学上呈楔形的骨折段的病例中,切除骨折的髁突段以实现开口并随后处理咬合情况可能对患者有益。