Graduate student, Graduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
Denture liners are well known for their poor physical properties that favor the accumulation of plaque and colonization by Candida species, which can irritate the oral tissues and lead to denture stomatitis.
A systematic review was conducted to determine the feasibility of a prevention protocol for Candida colonization in denture liners and an effective treatment after the fungi has colonized the material.
Clinical and in vitro investigations that assessed the treatment and/or prevention of Candida colonization and biofilm formation in denture liners were selected according to the PRISMA statement. Seven electronic databases were searched from 1950 to April 2012 with the keywords "denture liner" OR "reline*" OR "tissue conditioner" AND "Candida" OR "denture stomatitis" OR "oral candidiasis" OR "antifungal agents" OR "denture clean*".
The incorporation of nystatin (in general, 500 000 units) into tissue conditioners to prevent the onset of the disease and immersion in sodium hypochlorite for disinfection were the methods most often described in this systematic review, and both methods were able to prevent or inhibit Candida colonization, depending on their concentrations. The 0.5% sodium hypochlorite concentration can disinfect tissue conditioners and denture liners. Microwave irradiation has also been described an alternative method of disinfection. Because of a lack of standardized results (especially with regard to the method used to perform microbial counts), a meta-analysis could not be performed.
The literature suggests that the use of 0.5% sodium hypochlorite can help disinfect denture liners and tissue conditioners. The incorporation of nystatin in those materials is also able to treat or prevent oral candidiasis. However, as most of the studies were in vitro, there is insufficient reliable evidence to truly provide recommendations regarding the ideal cleaning method or whether the addition of antifungal agents is worthwhile. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to provide answers to these questions.
义齿衬垫以其较差的物理性能而闻名,这些性能有利于牙菌斑的积累和念珠菌的定植,这会刺激口腔组织并导致义齿性口炎。
进行了系统评价,以确定预防义齿衬垫中念珠菌定植的方案的可行性,以及真菌定植后对衬垫材料进行有效治疗的方案。
根据 PRISMA 声明,选择了评估治疗和/或预防义齿衬垫中念珠菌定植和生物膜形成的临床和体外研究。从 1950 年到 2012 年 4 月,使用“义齿衬垫”或“重新衬垫”或“组织调节剂”和“念珠菌”或“义齿性口炎”或“口腔念珠菌病”或“抗真菌剂”或“义齿清洁”等关键词,在七个电子数据库中进行了搜索。
在本系统评价中,最常描述的方法是将制霉菌素(通常为 500 万单位)掺入组织调节剂中以预防疾病的发生和将义齿浸泡在次氯酸钠中进行消毒。这两种方法都能够预防或抑制念珠菌的定植,具体取决于其浓度。0.5%的次氯酸钠浓度可以对组织调节剂和义齿衬垫进行消毒。微波辐射也被描述为一种替代消毒方法。由于缺乏标准化的结果(尤其是在执行微生物计数时使用的方法方面),因此无法进行荟萃分析。
文献表明,使用 0.5%的次氯酸钠有助于消毒义齿衬垫和组织调节剂。在这些材料中掺入制霉菌素也能够治疗或预防口腔念珠菌病。然而,由于大多数研究都是在体外进行的,因此没有足够可靠的证据来真正提供有关理想清洁方法的建议,或者添加抗真菌剂是否值得。需要进行设计良好的随机对照试验来回答这些问题。