Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Oct;38(8):925-34. doi: 10.1111/apt.12479. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is an under-recognised diagnosis with important clinical implications when untreated. However, the optimal treatment regimen remains unclear.
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the clinical effectiveness of antibiotic therapies in the treatment of symptomatic patients with documented SIBO.
Four databases were searched to identify clinical trials comparing effectiveness of: (i) different antibiotics, (ii) different doses of the same antibiotic and (iii) antibiotics compared with placebo. Data were independently extracted according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study quality was independently assessed. The primary outcome was normalisation of post-treatment breath testing. The secondary outcome was post-treatment clinical response.
Of 1356 articles identified, 10 met inclusion criteria. Rifaximin was the most commonly studied antibiotic (eight studies) with overall breath test normalisation rate of 49.5% (95% confidence interval, CI 44.0-55.1) (44.0%-55.1%) then (46.7%-55.5%), then (4.6%-17.8%). Antibiotic efficacy varied by antibiotic regimen and dose. Antibiotics were more effective than placebo, with a combined breath test normalisation rate of 51.1% (95% CI 46.7-55.5) for antibiotics compared with 9.8% (95% CI 4.6-17.8) for placebo. Meta-analysis of four studies favoured antibiotics over placebo for breath test normalisation with an odds ratio of 2.55 (95% CI 1.29-5.04). Clinical response was heterogeneously evaluated among six studies, but tended to correlate with breath test normalisation.
Antibiotics appear to be more effective than placebo for breath test normalisation in patients with symptoms attributable to SIBO, and breath test normalisation may correlate with clinical response. Studies were limited by modest quality, small sample size and heterogeneous design. Additional higher quality clinical trials of SIBO therapy are warranted.
小肠细菌过度生长(SIBO)是一种未被充分认识的诊断,在未经治疗的情况下具有重要的临床意义。然而,最佳治疗方案仍不清楚。
系统评价和荟萃分析比较有症状的 SIBO 患者经不同抗生素治疗的临床疗效。
检索了四个数据库,以确定比较以下内容的临床试验:(i)不同抗生素,(ii)相同抗生素的不同剂量,(iii)抗生素与安慰剂。根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准,独立提取数据。独立评估研究质量。主要结局是治疗后呼气试验正常化。次要结局是治疗后临床反应。
在 1356 篇文章中,有 10 篇符合纳入标准。利福昔明是研究最多的抗生素(8 项研究),其整体呼气试验正常化率为 49.5%(95%置信区间,44.0-55.1)(44.0%-55.1%),然后是(46.7%-55.5%),然后是(4.6%-17.8%)。抗生素的疗效因抗生素方案和剂量而异。抗生素比安慰剂更有效,抗生素的联合呼气试验正常化率为 51.1%(95%置信区间,46.7-55.5),而安慰剂为 9.8%(95%置信区间,4.6-17.8)。四项研究的荟萃分析显示,抗生素组的呼气试验正常化率明显高于安慰剂组,优势比为 2.55(95%置信区间,1.29-5.04)。六项研究对临床反应的评估存在异质性,但倾向于与呼气试验正常化相关。
抗生素似乎比安慰剂更能有效治疗 SIBO 引起的症状患者的呼气试验正常化,且呼气试验正常化可能与临床反应相关。这些研究受到质量中等、样本量小和设计异质性的限制。需要进行更多高质量的 SIBO 治疗临床试验。