Suppr超能文献

哪些髌骨可能会再次脱位?

Which patellae are likely to redislocate?

作者信息

Balcarek Peter, Oberthür Swantje, Hopfensitz Stephanie, Frosch Stephan, Walde Tim Alexander, Wachowski Martin Michael, Schüttrumpf Jan Philipp, Stürmer Klaus Michael

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Centre, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany,

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Oct;22(10):2308-14. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2650-5. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for recurrent lateral patellar dislocations and to incorporate those factors into a patellar instability severity score.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients [male/female 35/26; median age 19 years (range 9-51 years)] formed the study group for this investigation. Within the study group, 40 patients experienced a patellar redislocation within 24 months after the primary dislocation, whereas 21 patients, who were assessed after a median follow-up of 37 months (range 24-60 months), had not experienced a subsequent episode of lateral patellar instability. In all patients, age at the time of the primary dislocation, gender, the affected body side, body mass index, bilateral instability, physical activity according to Baecke's questionnaire, the grade of trochlear dysplasia, patellar height, tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, and patellar tilt were assessed. The odds ratio (OR) of each factor with regard to the patellar redislocation was calculated using contingency tables. Based on these data, a "patellar instability severity score" was calculated.

RESULTS

The patellar instability severity score has six factors: age, bilateral instability, the severity of trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, TT-TG distance, and patellar tilt; the total possible score is seven. Reapplying this score to the study population revealed a median score of 4 points (range 2-7) for those patients with an early episode of patellar redislocation and a median score of 3 points (range 1-6) for those without a redislocation (p=0.0004). The OR for recurrent dislocations was 4.88 (95% CI 1.57-15.17) for the patients who scored 4 or more points when compared with the patients who scored 3 or fewer points (p=0.0064).

CONCLUSION

Based on the individual patient data, the patellar instability severity score allows an initial risk assessment for experiencing a recurrent patellar dislocation and might help differentiate between responders and non-responders to conservative treatment after primary lateral patellar instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case-control study, Level III.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定复发性外侧髌股关节脱位的危险因素,并将这些因素纳入髌股关节不稳定严重程度评分系统。

方法

61例患者(男性35例,女性26例;中位年龄19岁,范围9 - 51岁)组成了本研究的研究组。在研究组中,40例患者在初次脱位后24个月内发生了髌骨再脱位,而21例患者在中位随访37个月(范围24 - 60个月)后接受评估,未发生后续外侧髌股关节不稳定发作。对所有患者评估初次脱位时的年龄、性别、患侧肢体、体重指数、双侧不稳定情况、根据贝克问卷评估的体力活动情况、滑车发育不良程度、髌骨高度、胫骨结节 - 滑车沟(TT - TG)距离以及髌骨倾斜度。使用列联表计算每个因素与髌骨再脱位相关的比值比(OR)。基于这些数据,计算出“髌股关节不稳定严重程度评分”。

结果

髌股关节不稳定严重程度评分有六个因素:年龄、双侧不稳定、滑车发育不良严重程度、高位髌骨、TT - TG距离和髌骨倾斜度;总可能评分为7分。将该评分重新应用于研究人群,发现早期发生髌骨再脱位的患者中位评分为4分(范围2 - 7),未发生再脱位的患者中位评分为3分(范围1 - 6)(p = 0.0004)。与评分为3分及以下的患者相比,评分为4分及以上的患者复发性脱位的OR为4.88(95%CI 1.57 - 15.17)(p = 0.0064)。

结论

基于个体患者数据,髌股关节不稳定严重程度评分可对复发性髌骨脱位进行初步风险评估,并可能有助于区分初次外侧髌股关节不稳定后对保守治疗有反应者和无反应者。

证据水平

病例对照研究,III级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验