Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1114-9. doi: 10.1111/anae.12389. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
In 2008, the UK National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) made recommendations for safe arterial line management. Following a patient safety incident in our intensive care unit (ICU), we surveyed current practice in arterial line management and determined whether these recommendations had been adopted. We contacted all 241 adult ICUs in the UK; 228 (94.6%) completed the survey. Some NPSA recommendations have been widely implemented - use of sodium chloride 0.9% as flush fluid, two-person checking of fluids before use - and their practice was consistent. Others have been incompletely implemented and many areas of practice (prescription of fluids, two-person checking at shift changes, use of opaque pressure bags, arterial sampling technique) were highly variable. More importantly, the use of the wrong fluid as an arterial flush was reported by 30% of respondents for ICU practice, and a further 30% for practice elsewhere in the hospital. Our survey provides evidence of continuing risk to patients.
2008 年,英国国家患者安全局(NPSA)就安全动脉置管管理提出了建议。在我们的重症监护病房(ICU)发生了一起患者安全事件后,我们调查了目前动脉置管管理的实践情况,并确定是否采用了这些建议。我们联系了英国所有 241 家成人 ICU;228 家(94.6%)完成了调查。一些 NPSA 的建议已得到广泛实施 - 使用 0.9%氯化钠作为冲洗液,在使用前双人核对液体 - 其实施情况一致。其他建议则没有得到完全实施,实践中存在许多方面(液体的处方、班次更换时的双人核对、使用不透明的压力袋、动脉采血技术)存在高度差异。更重要的是,30%的受访者报告在 ICU 实践中使用了错误的液体作为动脉冲洗液,还有 30%的受访者报告在医院其他地方使用了错误的液体。我们的调查为患者持续面临风险提供了证据。